Feb 11, 2025 Board of Supervisors

[8a. 115-22 REZ2022-00002 Three Chopt Markel | Eagle Advisors, LLC: Request to conditionally rezone from A-1 Agricultural District to R-5AC General Residence District (Conditional) part of Parcels 733-778-7649 and 734-777-3893 containing 46.599 acres located at the southwest intersection of Pouncey Tract Road (State Route 271) and Wyndham West Drive. The applicant proposes a single-family residential development. The R-5A District allows a maximum gross density of 6 units per acre. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Rural Residential, density should not exceed 1 unit per acre. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. (Deferred from the October 8, 2024, meeting; Deferral requested to the May 13, 2025, meeting.) ]

REQUEST OFF OF POUNCEY TRACT ROAD, IN WHICH CASE A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED.

MR. EMERSON THE DEFERRAL IS FURL IS REQUESTED TO MAY THE 13TH.

IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR. THAT IS CORRECT. MR..

THANK YOU SIR. MR.. MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT.

I MOVE THAT R&B 2022 002 A MOTION TO THE MAY 13TH, 2025 MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

SECOND, THERE'S A MOTION MADE AND A SECOND. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS DEFERRAL? IS THERE ANYONE ON WEBEX? I WANT TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

IT'S BEEN PROPERLY MOVED AND SECONDED BY MISS ROUNDTREE AND THEN SECONDED BY MR. ROGERS. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.

MR. MANAGER. NEXT, MR. CHAIR 341 DASH 24 IS A REQUEST TO AMEND PROFFERS.

[8b. 341-24 REZ-2024-101247 Brookland PANDEV, LLC: Request to amend proffers accepted with REZ2018-00022 on Parcels 761-754-8398, 761-755-5910, 761-755-6607, and 761-755-7503, and to conditionally rezone from R-3 One-Family Residence District to R-3C One-Family Residence District (Conditional) Parcels 761-755-6824 and 761-755-8413 containing 0.88 acres, located on the north line of W. Broad Street (U.S. Route 250) between Pine Grove Drive and Hollybrook Avenue. The existing zoning is B-2C Business District (Conditional) and R-3 One-Family Residence District. The applicant proposes to amend proffers on the business zoned property related to various development requirements and provide for buffers on the proposed R-3C portion of the site. A convenience store with fuel pumps is proposed. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Commercial Arterial and Suburban Residential 2, density should not exceed 3.4 units per acre. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. (Deferred from the December 3, 2024, meeting; Deferral requested to the March 11, 2025, meeting.) ]

THERE'S A COMPANION CASE. 342 DASH 24 THAT WOULD REQUEST A PROVISIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER CHAPTER 24 OF THE CODE.

MR. EMMERSON, AGAIN, BOTH OF THESE ITEMS ARE A REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL TO MARCH THE 11TH.

YES, SIR. THAT IS CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR.

THIS IS ALSO A PUBLIC HEARING. JOE, CAN I HANDLE BOTH THESE OR THEIR INDIVIDUAL MOTIONS? RIGHT. NORMALLY INDIVIDUAL MOTIONS, BUT YOU COULD COMBINE THEM IF YOU CHOOSE.

I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY PROHIBITION TO THAT.

ALL RIGHT. MR. NEWBY? YES. THERE'S TWO ITEMS. CORRECT. YOU COULD CALL FOR HEARING ON BOTH SIMULTANEOUSLY.

AND THEN I WOULD MAKE A MOTION ON EACH. FRANKLIN.

OKAY. THANK YOU SIR. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO EITHER THE REZONING CASE OR THE PUP DEFERRAL REQUEST? ANYONE ON WEBEX TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE OR THE PUP WANT TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I'LL MOVE THAT. RE Z 2024 101247 PANDEV LLC BE DEFERRED TO THE MARCH 11TH MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

SECOND. SECONDED BY MR. ROGERS. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY OPPOSED? AND THEN ALSO, SINCE THERE WAS NO COMMENT, NOBODY HERE TO COMMENT, I'LL ALSO MOVE THAT THE PUP 2024 101 250 PANDEV LLC BE ALSO DEFERRED TO THE MARCH 11TH, 2025 MEETING.

ALSO AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. SECOND.

SECOND BY MISS ROUNDTREE. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES, MR. MAYOR. NEXT, MR.

[00:15:01]

CHAIR. 340 DASH 24 OUT OF THE VERONA DISTRICT PORTUGUESE PROPERTY, LLC.

[8c. 342-24 PUP-2024-101250 Brookland PANDEV, LLC: Request for a Provisional Use Permit under Sections 24-2306, 24-4205, and 24-4315.E of Chapter 24 of the County Code to allow for 24-hour operation of a convenience store on Parcels 761-754-8398, 761-755-5910, 761-755-6607, and 761-755-7503 located on the north line of W. Broad Street (U.S. Route 250) between Pine Grove Drive and Hollybrook Avenue. The existing zoning is B-2C Business District (Conditional). -The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Commercial Arterial and Suburban Residential 2, density should not exceed 3.4 units per acre. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. (Deferred from the December 3, 2024, meeting; Deferral requested to the March 11, 2025, meeting.) ]

IN WHICH A CONDITIONAL REZONING IS PUT FORWARD IN WHICH THE APPLICANT PROPOSES FLEX OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USES.

[8d. 340-24 REZ-2024 101707 Varina Portugee Property LLC: Request to conditionally rezone from A-1 Agricultural District to M-2C General Industrial District (Conditional) Parcel 834-704-4079 containing 12.28 acres located at the western terminus of Portugee Place. The applicant proposes flex office and warehouse uses. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Traditional Neighborhood Development. The site is located in the Airport Safety Overlay District. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors deny the request. (Deferred from the December 3, 2024, meeting; Deferral requested to the April 8, 2025, meeting.) ]

MR. EMERSON, WE HAVE A DEFERRAL REQUEST TO THE APRIL 8TH MEETING.

IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR. THAT IS CORRECT, MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU SIR. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS REZONING CASE? ANYONE ON WEBEX? THERE IS NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. MR. NELSON.

CHAIR, I MOVE THAT REZ 2024 101707 PORTUGUESE PROPERTY LLC BE DEFERRED TO THE APRIL 8TH, 2025 MEETING AT THE AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

MOTION MADE BY MR. NELSON. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

SECONDED BY MR. COOPER. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MR. MAYOR. MR. CHAIR. 346 DASH 24 OUT OF THE FAIRFIELD DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION LLC WITH A CONDITIONAL REZONING REQUEST,

[8e. 346-24 REZ-2024-102032 Fairfield AIM Transportation, LLC: Request to conditionally rezone from B-3 Business District to M-1C Light Industrial District (Conditional) Parcels 799-730-4478 and 799-730-8639 containing 14.03 acres located on the northwest line of Mechanicsville Turnpike (U.S. Route 360) at its intersection with St. Claire Lane. The applicant proposes a truck rental and maintenance facility. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Commercial Arterial. The site is in the Enterprise Zone. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. (Deferred from the December 3, 2024, meeting.) ]

IN WHICH CASE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A TRUCK RENTAL AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY.

MR. EMERSON, I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A DEFERRAL ON THIS ITEM AS WELL.

YES, SIR. I BELIEVE REVEREND COOPER IS INTENDING TO DEFER THIS ONE TO ALLOW FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE APPLICATION.

MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU. MR. EMERSON, IS THERE ANYONE ANY COMMENTS FROM MY COLLEAGUES? SEEING NONE. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? ANYONE ON WEBEX? THERE IS NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. MR. COOPER.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT REZ DASH 2024-102032 AME TRANSPORTATION LLC BE DEFERRED TO THE MARCH 11TH, 2025 MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF THE BOARD. MOTION.

MOTION MADE BY MR. COOPER. SECONDED BY MISS ROUNDTREE.

THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES, MR. MAYOR. NEXT, MR. CHAIR. 53 DASH 25 OUT OF THE FAIRFIELD DISTRICT.

THE RAIL COMPANY WITH A CONDITIONAL REZONING REQUEST.

[8f. 53-25 REZ-2024-102498 Fairfield The Kittrell Company: Request to conditionally rezone from R-2 One-Family Residence District to R-4C One-Family Residence District (Conditional) Parcels 783-749-1680 and 783-749-2044 containing 8.40 acres located on the south line of Hilliard Road (State Route 161) approximately 700’ east of its intersection with Club Road. The applicant proposes a single-family development. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Suburban Residential 2, density should not exceed 3.4 units per acre and Environmental Protection Area. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. ]

IN WHICH CASE THE APPLICANT PROPOSES A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GRANT THIS REQUEST, MR. EMERSON. YES, SIR. MR. MANAGER, THIS IS A REQUEST TO CONDITIONALLY REZONE 8.4 ACRES.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HILLIARD ROAD, AND IT IS BEING REQUESTED TO BE REZONE TO R4 C1 FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT TO DEVELOP 18 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. OF COURSE, IT IS SURROUNDED BY THE BELMONT GOLF COURSE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HILLIARD.

THE EXISTING HOME LABELED LOT ONE ON THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN IN FRONT OF YOU WOULD REMAIN, AND A ROAD WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED TO ITS EAST TO ACCESS 17 NEW HOMES TOWARDS THE SOUTH. THE LOTS WILL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH UPLAND BROOK TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF THE PROPERTY.

THE APPLICANT HAS PROFFERED TO REZONE PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY THAT INCLUDE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN TO C1.

PRIOR TO THE SUBDIVISION RECORDATION. OF COURSE, IT OCCURS IN THAT THAT SEQUENCE TO ALLOW THE ENGINEERING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO ASCERTAIN EXACT MEASUREMENTS OF THAT FEATURE. THE EASTERN ENTRANCE TO THE EXISTING HOME FROM HILLIARD ROAD WILL BE REMOVED, AND THE REST OF THE FRONTAGE WOULD HAVE A 25 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPED AREA IN ADDITION TO RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION AND A SIDEWALK.

FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED ALONG ONE SIDE OF THE INTERIOR ROAD.

OTHER PROPERTIES INCLUDE. ELEVATIONS. WITH AT LEAST 75% OF THE HOMES HAVING GARAGES.

HOUSES. ALL HOMES WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 1600 SQUARE FEET, AS WAS SEEN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN.

TWO AREAS ARE MARKED RESERVED. THESE AREAS ARE NOT PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT AT ANY TIME.

THE APPLICANT HAS OR WILL APPROACH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO SEE IF THEY ARE INTERESTED IN PURCHASING, AND IF NOT, THEY WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSED LOTS SIX AND SEVEN.

THE LARGER AREA MAY ALSO BECOME PART OF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IF NO TRANSFER OCCURS.

THESE WILL BECOME COMMON OPEN SPACE. THESE WILL BE RESOLVED DURING THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS.

THE 2026 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDS SHR TWO, WITH THE RECOMMENDED DENSITY NOT TO EXCEED 3.4 UNITS PER ACRE, AND EPA. THE PROPOSED USE AND DENSITY OF 2.14 UNITS PER ACRE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AT THE JANUARY 9TH, 2025 PUBLIC HEARING.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I'LL BE HAPPY TO TRY AND TRY AND ANSWER THEM. THANK YOU SIR.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. EMERSON? MR. EMERSON? SO CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY IS ZONED R TWO.

CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT. YES. SO THEY'RE REQUESTING TO REZONE IT TO R4.

YES, SIR. CAN YOU BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN THE TWO? WELL, THEY'RE BOTH RESIDENTIAL USES. THE R4 LOT SIZE IS IS SLIGHTLY SMALLER THAN THE R2 LOT SIZE, BUT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING IN THE AREA, WITH R5 EXISTING TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY

[00:20:03]

AND AND THEN R4 EXISTING TO THE WEST, AND I BELIEVE, TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY.

SO BASICALLY THE WAY IT'S ZONED CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES COULD BE BUILT ON THAT SPACE.

YES, SIR. THEY COULD. I BELIEVE THE DIFFERENCE WOULD PROBABLY BE LESS THAN FIVE LOTS DIFFERENCE.

DO YOU FEEL BASED UPON THE ELEVATIONS AND THE USAGE THAT THIS IS A GOOD, GOOD DEVELOPMENT? YES, SIR, I DO. I THINK IT'S A NICE PROPOSAL.

I THINK IT'S THINK IT'S A GOOD USE OF THE PROPERTY. YOU MENTIONED THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE. DO YOU HAVE THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE? NO, SIR, THERE'S NOT A MAXIMUM. OKAY. TODAY I RECEIVED A COPY OF A LETTER FROM RESIDENTS ON CLUB ROAD.

ARE YOU. ARE YOU IN RECEIPT OF THAT? THAT LETTER? YES, SIR, I AM.

AND SO YOU'RE AWARE WHAT THEY'RE ASKING IN REGARDS TO EFFORTS TO PRESERVE THE CURRENT, UNOBSTRUCTED VIEW? FOR THE PROPERTY WITH THE EVERGREENS. YES, SIR.

THEY'RE ASKING FOR SOME ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS RIGHT ALONG.

WHERE THIS WHERE I'M SHOWING MY CURSOR. I CAN'T BRING UP THEIR EMAIL.

OF COURSE. WE RECEIVED IT LATE TODAY. AND AS YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU CAME INTO MY OFFICE, I WAS MY COMPUTER WAS REFUSING TO CONNECT TO THE NETWORK.

BUT I DO BELIEVE WE CAN WORK WITH REC AND PARKS FIRST TEE.

AND, OF COURSE, THE COUNTY OWNS PART OF THIS PROPERTY. THERE'S A THERE'S A RIGHT OF WAY HERE, BUT REC AND PARKS, I BELIEVE WE WE ARE STILL IN OWNERSHIP OF THE COURSE.

WE JUST HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH FIRST TEE TO OPERATE.

SO I THINK THE THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING, WE CAN WORK THROUGH THE PROCESS AND, AND DURING THE LANDSCAPING PLAN THAT'S REQUIRED THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS, WE'LL BE ABLE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AND AND ACHIEVE SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WHETHER IT COMES ON ON OUR PART THROUGH REC AND PARKS AND FIRST TR COMBINATION OF THE APPLICANT, THE COUNTY WORKING TOGETHER. MR. MANAGER, ARE YOU WILLING TO HELP ME WITH THAT? ABSOLUTELY, MR. COOPER. SO THIS IS MULTIPLE OPPORTUNITIES THAT YOU HAVE, WHETHER IT'S ON AND I THINK THE LINE RUNS RIGHT BEHIND THE SUBDIVISION, AS I RECALL. YES, SIR. IT DOES. SO, YES, WE HAVE SOME FLEXIBILITY.

WE ALSO HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH CAPITAL TREES.

SO ABSOLUTELY, THIS WOULD BE THIS IS MR. YOB HAS QUITE A FEW EFFORTS UNDERWAY FOR THE SPRING.

HOPEFULLY WE CAN TIE IT INTO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.

AND WHEN YOU BRING THE LANDSCAPING, WE CAN. ABSOLUTELY.

YES, SIR. WE CAN. THANK YOU. MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE RZ-2024-102498. THE CONTROL COMPANY WITH THE PROFFERS DATED JANUARY 7TH, 2025.

THANK YOU SIR. IT'S BEEN A MOTION MADE BY MR. COOPER. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ANYBODY IN THE ROOM WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? ANYBODY ON WEBEX? YES, SIR. I HAVE ONE INDIVIDUAL, MR. ANDREW HALL.

THANK YOU. MA'AM. GO AHEAD. HI. I'M SORRY I CAN NO LONGER HEAR YOU.

SO HOPE. HOPEFULLY YOU CAN HEAR ME. I'M A LONG TIME RESIDENT ON CLUB ROAD, AND I'M NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT ON HILLYARD.

BUT I KNOW THAT WHEN THE LAKESIDE LANDING APARTMENT COMPLEX WAS BUILT SEVERAL YEARS AGO ON BROOK THE NOISE LEVEL FROM BROOK ROAD BECAME SIGNIFICANTLY LOUDER ON OUR STREET.

WITH THE LACK OF TREE COVER BLOCKING THE NOISE.

ADDITIONALLY, THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF LIGHT COMING THROUGH FROM THE LAKESIDE LANDING COMPLEX.

OBVIOUSLY, YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT THAT ANYMORE.

I DON'T SUSPECT A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE A LOT OF LIGHT, BUT JUST CONCERN ABOUT THE THE NOISE COMING FROM BROOK ROAD.

ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS? BUILDING A DEVELOPMENT THAT CLOSE RIGHT NEXT TO UPHAM BROOK, WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER WATCH FROM YOU KNOW, THE WATER QUALITY GROUPS AND THE FWC AND FRIENDS OF UPHAM BROOK FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

SO I JUST WANT TO ASSURE THAT STUDIES WILL BE DONE AS FAR AS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.

I KNOW THAT'S NORMALLY PROTOCOL, BUT YEAH, JUST KNOWING THAT THAT'S NORMALLY BEEN A VERY HEAVILY WOODED AREA AND WE APPRECIATE HAVING THAT BUFFER THERE.

FROM BOTH LIGHT ON BROOK ROAD AND NOISE FROM BROOK ROAD.

AND WE'RE JUST CONCERNED THAT REMOVING THAT VEGETATION AND PUTTING IN A LARGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO JUST ALTER THAT OVER ON OUR SIDE OF THE STREET.

THANK YOU, SIR. ANYBODY ELSE ON WEBEX, MA'AM? THERE'S NO ONE ELSE TO SPEAK ON WEBEX. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS? JOE, DO YOU THINK THIS WILL HELP A LITTLE BIT ON THAT SIDE? IF WE COULD DO THAT.

I THINK IT WILL. YES, SIR. AND CERTAINLY AS WE WORK THROUGH THE PROCESS, WE'LL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITIZENS.

AND ANYBODY THAT HAS A CONCERN CAN CAN CONTACT US AND WE'LL SIT DOWN WITH THEM AND SEE WHAT WE CAN DO TO ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS.

THANK YOU. JUST A SUGGESTION THAT WE GET THIS GENTLEMAN'S INFORMATION AND JOE CAN REACH OUT AS THAT PLAN IS COMING FORWARD.

[00:25:02]

PLEASE DO. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. BE HAPPY TO.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. THERE'S BEEN A MOTION BY MR. COOPER. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND. BY MR. ROGUISH. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. MR. MANAGER. THANKS, MR. CHAIR.

54 DASH 25 OUT OF THE TUCKAHOE DISTRICT IS DRC PROPERTIES, LLC SEE WITH A CONDITIONAL REZONING REQUEST.

[8g. 54-25 REZ-2024-102303 Tuckahoe DRC Properties LLC: Request to conditionally rezone from B-1C Business District (Conditional) and B-2C Business District (Conditional) to B-2C Business District (Conditional) Parcel 750-745-1577 containing 1.79 acres located on the south line of Quioccasin Road approximately 260’ east of the intersection with Pemberton Road (State Route 157). The applicant proposes a drive-thru restaurant and other retail. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Commercial Concentration. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. ]

PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF QUIOCCASIN ROAD, NEAR ITS INTERSECTION WITH PEMBERTON ROAD, AND HERE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT AND OTHER RETAIL.

PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD GRANT THIS REQUEST, MR. EMMERSON. YES, SIR. MR. MANAGER, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, THIS REQUEST IS TO REZONE 1.79 ACRES FROM B TO C AND B1C TO B TO C BUSINESS TO ALLOW A RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE THRU ON THE SOUTH LINE OF QUIOCCASIN ADJACENT TO THE DMV.

THIS IS A FORMER JIFFY LUBE I BELIEVE. THE PROPERTY WAS LAST REZONED IN 2001 FOR COMMERCIAL RETAIL ONLY.

AN OIL CHANGE BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE REMAINING RETAIL.

NEVER DID, NEVER DID QUITE MATERIALIZE. THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO CONVERT AND SLIGHTLY ENLARGE FROM 1840FT² TO THOUSAND 564FT², INCLUDING OUTDOOR SEATING.

THE FORMER JIFFY LUBE FOR GENERAL RETAIL, AND HAD A SECOND TENANT COMPRISING OF 2645FT² AND A DRIVE THRU FOR DUNKIN AND BASKIN-ROBBINS. THE AGGREGATE SQUARE FOOTAGE WOULD BECOME 5209FT², WHICH WOULD REQUIRE 53 PARKING SPACES, AND THEY'RE PROVIDING 54 PARKING, AS WELL AS THE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE EXPANDED TO THE EAST OF THE SITE, SO THERE WOULD BE NO FURTHER ENCROACHMENT TO THE SOUTH TOWARD FARMINGTON'S RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

OTHER SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE SEVERAL OFFICES, INCLUDING THE DMV, A VETERINARIAN PRACTICE, PEMBERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND MIDDLE SCHOOL ARE LOCATED TO THE NORTHWEST.

VACANT RETAIL OFFICE ACREAGE IN THE FARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE SOUTH.

WE DO HAVE A PROPER BUILDING ELEVATION. AND YOU SEE IT ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU.

OTHER PROFFERS ADDRESS USES. ALTHOUGH THE PROPERTY WOULD BE UP ZONED, THE ONLY BE TWO USE WOULD BE THE RESTAURANT WITH THE DRIVE THRU.

HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD BE FROM 6 A.M. TO 10 P.M..

SPEAKERS WOULD NOT BE AUDIBLE BEYOND 100FT FROM THE SOURCE.

SITE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD INCLUDE A 30 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA ALONG CLARKSON ROAD, PLANTED TO A TRANSITIONAL BUFFER.

25, IN THE EXISTING 15 FOOT LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE WOULD REMAIN.

THE TB TEN WILL BE REQUIRED BY THE CODE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY.

IT ALREADY MEETS THIS CRITERIA WITH THE EXISTING VEGETATION IN MORE THAN 100FT OF OPEN SPACE.

THE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE 2026 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

STAFF CONSIDERS THIS A VERY NICE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT THIS LOCATION.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AT ITS MEETING ON JANUARY 9TH.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO TRY AND ANSWER THEM. THANK YOU SIR.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR JOE? MR. CHAIR, JUST ONE, SIR.

MR. EMERSON, I PRESUME, WITH THE ON THE WESTERN SIDE.

WE DID NOT HEAR FROM THE DMV, I PRESUME? NO. DID WE HEAR FROM ANY OTHER FOLKS ON THE EAST SIDE? WE HEARD FROM MR. ALEXANDER, AND THEY WERE SUPPORTIVE OF THIS.

HE IS SUPPORTIVE. AND HE SENT AN EMAIL IN STATING THAT.

THANK YOU TO MR. ALEXANDER. THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS PUBLIC HEARING? ANYONE ON WEBEX? THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

MR. ROGERS. MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE REZ 2024 1020 303 DRC PROPERTIES LLC WITH A PROFFERS DATED JANUARY 14TH, 2025. SECOND, A MOTION MADE BY MR. ROGERS, SECONDED BY MISS ROUNDTREE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES, MR. MAYOR. NEXT.

MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, WE MOVE INTO A PORTION OF THE AGENDA.

[9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OTHER ITEMS ]

[9a. 55-25 Resolution - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Design Guidelines for Small-Lot Single Family Residential Developments. ]

PUBLIC HEARING. OTHER ITEMS. THE NEXT THREE ITEMS COME TO YOU FROM YOUR ANNUAL RETREAT.

CREATION OF A NEW CATEGORY. A NEW ZONING CATEGORY R5 B THAT IS INTENDED TO.

BE ANOTHER EFFORT TOWARDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITH SMALLER LOTS.

MR. EMERSON, YOU LED THE BOARD THROUGH A WORK SESSION SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, SO I'M JUST GOING TO TOUCH ON JUST A SUMMARY OF ALL 355 DASH 25 IS A RESOLUTION. IT'S A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT OR DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THESE SMALL LOT FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS.

56 DASH 25 IS AN ORDINANCE THAT WOULD AMEND AND REORDAIN A NUMBER OF SECTIONS OF SECTION 24 OF THE COUNTY

[00:30:09]

CODE, ALL TO CREATE THAT R5 BE GENERAL RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND THEN 57 DASH 25.

MR. CHAIR BASICALLY CREATES SOME NEW STREET LAYOUT STANDARDS FOR THIS NEW ZONING CATEGORY.

SO, MR. EMERSON, I THINK THE BOARD SAW A LOT OF THIS LAST WEEK, MR. CHAIR. UP TO YOU AS TO HOW YOU WISH TO PROCEED.

ONE YOU'VE GOT THREE SEPARATE ITEMS, THREE SEPARATE VOTES.

MR. EMERSON, ANYTHING YOU WISH TO ADD TO WHAT I'VE ADDED? NO, SIR. MR. MANAGER, YOU PRETTY WELL COVERED IT.

WE HAVE THREE SEPARATE CODE AMENDMENTS. IT'S VERY SIMPLE.

AN EFFORT TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL TOOL TO ASSIST IN IN HOUSING IN THE COUNTY.

YEAH, WE HAVE COVERED THIS IN DEPTH, MR. MANAGER. THANK YOU FOR THE REMINDER. AND, JOE, THANK YOU FOR FOR THE WORK GETTING THIS TO HERE.

I WOULD SAY THIS IF MY COLLEAGUES AGREE, IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JOE, LET'S TAKE THEM NOW.

AND THEN LET'S TAKE THREE SEPARATE MOTIONS ON THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, ONE BY ONE.

IS THAT CORRECT, MR. NEWMAN? MR. CHAIR, THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON ALL THREE. YES, SIR. YEP. ANY QUESTIONS FOR JOE BEFORE WE CHECK WITH THE PUBLIC? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THESE THREE CASES? THE RESOLUTION, THE ORDINANCE OR THE OTHER? THE LAST ORDINANCE? ANYONE ON WEBEX WISH TO SPEAK TO THESE ITEMS? NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THESE ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

MA'AM. AT THIS TIME, SEEING NO COMMENTS IN PUBLIC HEARING AND NO QUESTIONS FOR JOE, I'LL ACCEPT A RESOLUTION ON 55 DASH 20, MOTION ON 55 DASH 25. SO MOVED. SECOND. MOTION MADE BY MR. COOPER. SECOND BY MISS ROUNDTREE. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? 55. 25 PASSES. IS THERE A MOTION FOR 56? 25? SO MOVED.

SECOND. MOTION MADE BY MISS ROUNDTREE. SECOND BY MR. ROGERS. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ORDINANCE PASSES.

AND IS THERE A MOTION ON THE ORDINANCE? 5725.

SO MOVED. SECOND. MOTION BY MR. ROGERS. SECOND BY MR.

[9b. 56-25 Ordinance - To Amend and Reordain Section 24-2314 Titled “Plan of Development,” Section 24-3102 Titled “Districts Established,” Section 24-3105 Titled “Superseding Dimensional Standards,” Section 24-3302 Titled “Established Residential Districts,” Section 24-4205 Titled “Principal Use Table,” Section 24-4306 Titled “Residential Uses: Household Living,” Section 24-4315 Titled “All Commercial Uses,” Section 24-4402 Titled “Accessory Use or Structure Table,” Section 24-4423 Titled “Accessory Outdoor Seating and Food Preparation (as accessory to an Eating Establishments use),” Section 24-4502 Titled “Temporary Use and Structure Table,” Section 24-5103 Titled “Access and Circulation System,” Section 24-5105 Titled “Off-Street Parking Surfacing and Marking,” Section 24-5308 Titled “Minimum Tree Cover,” Section 24-5310 Titled “Transitional Buffers,” Section 24-5503 Titled “General Standards,” Section 24-5707 Titled “Signs Requiring Permits,” and Section 24-8501 Titled “Accessory Uses, Temporary Uses, andOther Terms,” to Add a New Section 24-3314 Titled “R-5B General Residence District,” and to Renumber Existing Section 24-3314 Titled “R-5 General Residence District,” Existing Section 24-3315 Titled “R-6 General Residence District,” and Existing Section 24-3316 Titled “RTH Residential Townhouse District” of the Code of the County of Henrico To Create a New Zoning District to Be Known as the R-5B General Residence District and Establish Standards for Such District. ]

[9c. 57-25 Ordinance - To Amend and Reordain Section 19-3403 Titled “Street Layout Standards” to Provide Standards for a New Zoning District to Be Known as the R-5B General Residence District. ]

NELSON. THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES, MR. MAYOR. MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, YOU ARE STILL IN PUBLIC HEARING.

OTHER ITEMS. MR. YOB IS GOING TO COVER THE NEXT FOUR ITEMS FOR US.

58 DASH 25 IS THE RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY.

[9d. 58-25 Resolution - Signatory Authority - Abandonment and Quitclaim of Right-of-Way Near the Intersection of Brook Road and Magnolia Ridge Drive - Fairfield District. ]

ABANDONMENT AND QUIT CLAIM OF RIGHT OF WAY. THIS IS IN THE FAIRFIELD DISTRICT.

59 DASH 25 IS RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY.

A QUITCLAIM OF A PORTION OF A UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE VERONA DISTRICT.

60 DASH 25 AN ORDINANCE FOR VACATION OF SUBDIVISION PLAT.

THIS IS AGAIN IS IN THE VERONA DISTRICT. 61 DASH 25.

A RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY FOR A QUITCLAIM DEED IN THE VERONA DISTRICT.

THE LAST TWO. OBVIOUSLY. MR. YARBER. RELATED.

MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU SIR. ANY QUESTIONS? LET'S TAKE THE FAIRFIELD ONE.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. YARBOROUGH ON THE FAIRFIELD CASE? RESOLUTION 5825. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE IN THE ROOM WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS RESOLUTION? ANYONE ON WEBEX? THERE IS NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

MR. COOPER, SO MOVED. SECOND. MOTION MADE BY MR. COOPER, SECONDED BY MR. NELSON. THOSE IN FAVOR? SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. THE FOLLOWING THREE ARE ALL IN THE VERANDA DISTRICT.

IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THE RESOLUTION? 5925. THE ORDINANCE 60 25 OR RESOLUTION 6125.