[8a. 96-26 PUP-2026-100022 Brookland Spy Rock Real Estate Group: Request for a Provisional Use Permit under Sections 24-2306 and 24-3708 of Chapter 24 of the County Code to allow a mixed-use development with multifamily residential on Parcel 776-736-7233 located at the southeast intersection of Westmoreland Street and Jacque Street. The existing zoning is M-1 Light Industrial District. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Heavy Industry. The site is in the Westwood Redevelopment Overlay District. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. ]

THE SITE IS 1.61.86 ACRES ZONED M ONE AND CURRENTLY IS DEVELOPED WITH TWO ONE STORY OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED IN THE 1960S.

SO. SURFACE PARKING SURROUNDS THE BUILDINGS CURRENTLY WITH LITTLE TO.

STREET IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPT FOR SOME GRASSED AREAS ALONG GEORGE STREET, MOST NOTABLY. WHERE IT INTERSECTS WITH WESTMORELAND.

AN EXISTING RAIL LINE EASEMENT IS ALSO LOCATED ALONG THE PROPERTY EASTERN SIDE AND WOULD REMAIN AT THIS TIME.

THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO BUILD A SEVEN STORY MIXED USE BUILDING WITH THE FOLLOWING KEY COMPONENTS. THERE WOULD BE 224 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, APPROXIMATELY 2500FT² OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, A SIX STORY STRUCTURE PARKING DECK PROVIDING 303 PARKING SPACES ON THE EASTERN SIDE, WITH USES SURROUNDING AND WRAPPING ALONG THE

[00:50:06]

MAIN FRONTAGES. THERE WOULD BE ONE ENTRANCE TO THE PARKING DECK FROM DOCK STREET AND OF COURSE WOULD INCLUDE SOME RESIDENTIAL COURTYARD AMENITY AREAS AND A LEASING OFFICE ON THE GROUND FLOOR. THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A MASTER PLAN, INCLUDING IN THAT HAS ILLUSTRATIVE ELEVATIONS.

IT HAS STREET ELEVATIONS, AMENITIES, GREEN SPACE, GREEN SPACE CONCEPTS. AND THEN THE CONDITIONS OF THE REPORT DO REFLECT ON THE SPECIFIC ELEMENTS WITHIN THE MASTER PLAN.

OTHER KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PLAN INCLUDE A PROMINENT FEATURE TREATMENT ALONG WESTMORLAND AND DOCKS AT THE CORNER, OFFERING SOME GREEN SPACE AT THIS FOCAL POINT. STREET SECTION SHOWING FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS AND FOUR FOOT UTILITY STRIPS ALONG BOTH ROAD FRONTAGES WITH POTENTIAL PARALLEL PARKING ALONG DOCK STREET.

AND OF COURSE, AS MENTIONED, AMENITY AND GREEN SPACE CONCEPTS OFFERING A MIXTURE OF OPTIONS. FOR THE RESIDENTS, THE MASTER PLAN ALSO PROVIDES EXAMPLES OF POTENTIAL SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES, INCLUDING SOME EV PARKING SPACES AND BIKE PARKING, AND THIS IS SIMILAR TO THEIR OTHER DEVELOPMENT THAT THEY JUST COMPLETED ON DABNEY ROAD, KNOWN AS THE ALDER.

AS PART OF THE PROVISIONAL USE PERMIT, THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR A REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENTS, WHICH IS AN OPTION IN THE WESTWOOD REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT BASED ON THE HIGHER DENSITY PATTERNS AND THE PROXIMITY TO WEST BROAD STREET AND ITS STOPS ALONG THE GRTC. THE APPLICANT'S PARKING STUDY, WHICH IS ATTACHED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, SHOWS THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD OFFER 303 OFF STREET PARKING SPACES, WHICH IS THE EQUIVALENT OF 1.35 PARKING SPACES PER UNIT, WHICH WOULD, THEY SAY MEET AND EXCEED PEAK DEMAND EXPECTED ON THE WEEKDAYS AND WEEKENDS BY 17 SPACES AND 21 SPACES, RESPECTIVELY. AND THIS PARKING RATIO IS VERY CONSISTENT TO WHAT WE'VE APPROVED IN OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE WESTWOOD AREA.

THE 2026 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, WHICH TYPICALLY DOES NOT SUPPORT RESIDENTIAL USES.

HOWEVER, THE PROPERTY DOES LIE WITHIN THE WESTWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA ADOPTED IN 2018, WHICH RECOMMENDED ALLOWANCES FOR MORE URBAN, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES DESIGNED IN A WAY TO COEXIST WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES ESTABLISHED IN THE AREA. AND THIS IS DONE THROUGH THE TRIGGER OF A PROVISIONAL USE PERMIT, SO EACH ONE CAN BE EVALUATED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS.

THIS PROPOSAL WOULD SUPPORT THE ONGOING REVITALIZATION OF THE WESTWOOD AREA BY REDEVELOPING AGING INDUSTRIAL SITE INTO HIGH QUALITY MIXED USE PROJECT.

THE APPLICANT APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WESTWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA AND MEETS THE TECHNICAL STANDARDS OUTLINED IN THE MASTER PLAN AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

AND I SHOULD SAY THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

YOU JUST RECEIVED AND DATED MAY 1ST.

AND I'LL POINT OUT THE ONLY CHANGE IN THAT IS IN CONDITION NINE AND IS UNDERLINED.

AND THAT WAS BASED ON COMMENTS FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER HERE, WHICH SHARES A FIRE ACCESS ON THEIR SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE, WHICH JUST STATES THAT THAT SHARED PORTION OF THAT WOULD ONLY BE USED FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AS WELL AS COLLECTING REFUSE.

AND THAT'S THE ONLY ONLY USE WOULD BE ALLOWED.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AT THEIR APRIL 9TH MEETING. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. MORE COLLEAGUES.

ARE ANY QUESTIONS, MISS MOORE? NOT AT THIS TIME, SIR. OKAY.

I'M HEARING NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

WOULD YOU ALL LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT? YES, SIR. OKAY.

MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. MR. MANAGER, MY NAME IS PRESTON LLOYD. I'M AN ATTORNEY WITH THE FIRM WILLIAMS MULLEN, APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT SPY ROCK REAL ESTATE GROUP. I'M JOINED BY TAYLOR WILLIAMS AND JAKE BLOOM, ALSO OF SPY ROCK. IT'S MY PLEASURE TO PRESENT THE CASE THAT'S BEEN VERY THOROUGHLY DESCRIBED BY MISS MOORE, AND WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR THE THOROUGH VETTING BY THE STAFF AND BY THE FAVORABLE STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT FOLLOWED FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I DO HAVE A PRESENTATION, BUT I'LL PERHAPS NOT MOVE DIRECTLY INTO THAT PRESENTATION, BUT JUST ADDRESS ONE SPECIFIC COMMENT IN ADDITION TO THE PRESENTATION BY MRS. MOORE, WHICH RELATES TO FEEDBACK THAT WE RECEIVED AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THERE WAS A DESIRE TO EVALUATE THE PROVISION OF STREET PARKING ALONG WESTMORELAND TO HELP FACILITATE ACCESS TO THE NONRESIDENTIAL USE THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED,

[00:55:03]

AND TRY TO FACILITATE GREATER ACCESSIBILITY FROM STREET PARKING.

WE'VE INCLUDED A NUMBER OF SCHEMATICS IN OUR PRESENTATION THAT I'D BE HAPPY TO SHARE WITH THE BOARD, SHOULD THAT BE YOUR PLEASURE. THAT SHOWS THAT WE BELIEVE THAT THAT WOULD BE FEASIBLE, AND WE APPRECIATE THE POSITIVE FEEDBACK THAT RECOMMENDED THAT WE EXPLORE THAT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

THE SECOND POINT THAT I'LL MENTION IS THAT WHILE THE STAFF REPORT DOES REFER TO THE STUDENT GENERATION RATIOS APPLIED BASED ON WHAT WOULD BE EXPECTED FOR A MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE OF THIS NATURE I'LL OFFER ONE SPECIFIC PIECE OF FACTUAL INFORMATION THAT MAY BE BENEFICIAL TO THE BOARD AND JUST ASSESSING WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON SCHOOLS FROM A PROJECT SUCH AS THIS.

AND AS STAFF MENTIONED, SPY ROCK HAS PROVIDED AND DELIVERED THE ALDER, WHICH IS AN EQUIVALENT PRODUCT TYPE TO WHAT'S BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.

ALSO IN THE WESTWOOD SMALL AREA PLAN AREA.

AND THAT HAS 170 UNITS THAT HAVE BEEN DELIVERED AND ARE OCCUPIED TODAY.

OF THOSE 170 UNITS, THERE ARE SIX CHILDREN WHO ARE OF SCHOOL AGE AND WHO WOULD THEREFORE BE ELIGIBLE TO ATTEND HENRICO COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

SO APPLYING THAT TO THIS PROJECT, WITH THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT IT HAS, WE'D BE LOOKING AT APPROXIMATELY 8 TO 10 ADDITIONAL STUDENTS.

BY COMPARISON WITH A SIMILAR PRODUCT.

SO WE UNDERSTAND, OF COURSE, THAT THAT'S NOT THE TYPICAL WAY THAT THE SCHOOL SYSTEM DOES MAKE THEIR ASSESSMENT OF SCHOOL GENERATION, BUT WE THOUGHT IT A RELEVANT FACT FOR THE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION.

AND WITH THAT, I'LL CONCLUDE MY REMARKS.

BUT OF COURSE, WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT THE BOARD MAY HAVE. AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT RIGHT NOW? GO AHEAD. MR.. MIKE MR., WAS THAT YOU, MICHAEL? IT'S ON. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. MR. LLOYD, THANK YOU.

JUST A COUPLE QUICK QUESTIONS.

THE FIRE ACCESS ROAD, I SEE THAT THE CONDITION.

IT'S NOT A PROFFER, BUT I SEE ON HERE THAT IT'S ONLY TO BE USED FOR TRASH OR EMERGENCY, ETC. I GUESS THE QUESTION IS, WHAT PREVENTS PEOPLE FROM USING THAT AS A CUT THROUGH THE. THE ACCESS TO THE STRUCTURED PARKING WOULD BE FROM THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

SO RESIDENTS WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE STRUCTURED PARKING DECK FOR PURPOSES OF, OF ENTERING INGRESS AND EGRESS.

IT'S ONLY MEANT TO SERVICE THE BACK OF HOUSE, IF YOU WILL, THAT WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE VIA THAT ROUTE.

AND TO BE SPECIFIC, THE PUP LANGUAGE, THE CONDITION THAT YOU'RE REFERENCING WOULD BE IN THE EVENT THAT THERE IS JOINT ACCESS PROVIDED, MEANING WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS AN EASEMENT THAT WOULD STRADDLE THE LINE.

AND THE CONDITIONS OF THAT EASEMENT WOULD HAVE TO BE AGREED TO BY THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. AND SO ULTIMATELY THEY ARE IN CONTROL.

THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO THERE WOULD BE NO ABILITY TO UTILIZE THAT ACCESS ROAD OVER THEIR PROPERTY WITHOUT A SCOPE THAT HAD BEEN AGREED TO BY THEM.

AND SO WE BELIEVE THAT OFFERS ADDITIONAL PROTECTION.

THAT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE BOARD TO BE AWARE OF, RELATED TO WHETHER THE USE OF THAT ACCESS ROAD IS ONE THAT'S A COMPATIBLE USE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.

THANK YOU. THE THE OLD RAILROAD SPUR, THE WE'RE NOT GETTING RID OF THAT.

I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY TRAINS NOT GOING ON THAT TRACK ANY LONGER.

WE'RE NOT GETTING RID OF THAT.

NO, SIR. THAT THE THE FACILITIES THAT FORMERLY OCCUPIED THAT AREA WERE PURSUANT TO AN EASEMENT THAT RUNS IN FAVOR OF THE RAILROAD.

AND PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THAT EASEMENT, EVEN THOUGH THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT BE USABLE IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION, THE RAILROAD ULTIMATELY RETAINS THE RIGHT TO REESTABLISH ACCESS IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT THAT THAT WERE TO BE USABLE IN THE FUTURE.

AND SO WE'VE WE'VE ESSENTIALLY SET THAT ASIDE.

AND THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DOESN'T PROPOSE UTILIZATION OF THAT PARTICULAR AREA OF THE PROPERTY. OKAY. IN OTHER REPORTS THAT WE'VE SEEN, WE'VE ACTUALLY SEEN THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF ONE BEDROOM, TWO BEDROOM OR THREE BEDROOM.

IS THERE ANY REASON BECAUSE THAT DOES IMPACT THE PARKING.

IT ALSO IMPACTS THE SCHOOLS AS YOU AS YOU SAID, 170 YIELDED SIX STUDENTS.

IF THEIR STUDIOS ONE BEDROOMS, WE DON'T SEE A LOT. BUT IF THESE ARE TWO THREE BEDROOMS, IS THERE ANY REASON WHY WE HAVEN'T DEFINED HOW MANY BEDROOM APARTMENTS ARE GOING TO BE ON THIS? YES, SIR. AND THAT LEADS TO INFORMATION THAT MAY BE HELPFUL FOR THE BOARD TO CONSIDER.

AND I'LL APOLOGIZE TO MR. SCHMIDT, WHO HEARD THIS AS PART OF OUR PRESENTATION AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION. BUT THERE IS CURRENTLY A USE THAT'S ESTABLISHED AT THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS.

WE'RE REQUESTING THE PUP IN ORDER TO SET THE TABLE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD OCCUR AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE LEASE THAT CURRENTLY ALLOWS THAT USER TO OCCUPY THE PROPERTY.

AND SO THE BECAUSE OF THE TIME THAT WILL BE ELAPSED, WE WANTED TO PRESERVE SOME DEGREE OF FLEXIBILITY TO RESPOND TO THE MARKET AND NOT

[01:00:03]

HAVE AN INSTANCE WHERE IF WE NEED TO CHANGE, FOR INSTANCE, ONE UNIT FROM ONE PARTICULAR UNIT COUNT OR BEDROOM COUNT TO A DIFFERENT UNIT COUNT, THAT WE WOULD NEED TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR PERMISSION TO DO SO BEFORE THIS BOARD.

AND SO WE'VE WE'VE PROVIDED THE DEGREE OF DETAIL THAT WE HAVE IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT'S BEEN PROPOSED, THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN THAT'S PART OF THIS, BUT IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SPECIFIC UNIT BREAKDOWN THAT YOU'RE DESCRIBING, AND IT'S MERELY BECAUSE OF THAT TIMING.

RIGHT. BUT THAT DOES DRIVE THE STUDENT YIELD AND THE PARKING YIELD.

SO AGAIN, JUST IF IT'S NOT GOING TO BE BUILT FOR THE EXISTING USE, IT WOULD BE NICE TO DEFINE THAT.

JUST SO WE KNOW, IF WE'RE LOOKING AT, I THINK TUCKER HIGH SCHOOL, WE'RE LOOKING AT 17 STUDENTS ACCORDING TO THE SHEET HERE.

YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY IF IT'S MORE THREE BEDROOMS, WE COULD SEE THAT NUMBER GO UP TO A SCHOOL THAT'S ALREADY AT CAPACITY.

SO I JUST, I, YEAH. OKAY.

IN THE PATTERN BOOK, YOU'RE SHOWING FIVE STORY PICTURES.

THIS IS A SEVEN STORY STRUCTURE.

IS THAT CORRECT? THE THE IMAGES THAT I'M LOOKING AT IN THE BOOK HERE LOOK LIKE FIVE STORY APARTMENTS, BUT THIS.

YEAH. RIGHT THERE. THANK YOU.

BUT THIS IS A SEVEN STORY STRUCTURE.

IS THAT CORRECT? FORGIVE ME WHILE I REFERENCE MY NOTES HERE.

YES, SIR. THAT'S CORRECT.

OKAY. AND AND KIND OF ALONG THAT LINES, I DID NOTICE ONE OTHER DISCREPANCY THAT ON THE PARKING. REQUIRED PARKING WAS DONE FOR 3500 RETAIL SQUARE FEET.

AND I THINK IN THE PICTURE, IF YOU LOOK BACK A COUPLE OF YEAH, GO DOWN A COUPLE JEAN, PLEASE.

I'M NOT SURE WHAT PAGE IS ON ITS BACK A FEW PAGES.

YEAH, I'M NOT SURE I HAVE THE WHOLE BOOK ON HERE. OKAY. AND THE BOOK THAT I'M LOOKING AT, THE PICTURE THAT I'M LOOKING AT THIS IN THAT ONE RIGHT THERE, THE RETAIL SPACE IS SHOWING 2555.

IT'S VERY, VERY SMALL.

IT'S IN THE MIDDLE. IT SAYS MIXED USE APARTMENT BUILDING, SEVEN STORIES, 1810FT², AND THEN 220 UNITS, TWO, FIVE, FIVE, FIVE SQUARE FEET RETAIL.

YES, SIR. SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, IS IT 3500 OR 2500 IN TERMS OF THE RETAIL SPACE FOR THIS BUILDING? THE THE LAYOUT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE.

AND SO DOWN TO THE PRECISE SQUARE FOOTAGE.

I DON'T BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE WE WANTED TO LEAVE A LITTLE BIT OF ROOM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS TO ALLOW THAT TO BE PRECISELY DEFINED.

AND, AND SO I DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC SQUARE FOOTAGE TO OFFER YOU, MR. RAJESH. I GUESS I GUESS MY CONCERN IS AT 2525 55FT² RETAIL.

I MEAN, WE ARE CALLING IT MIXED USE, BUT THAT'S LIKE 1.5% RETAIL VERSUS HOUSING, WHICH AGAIN, IT'S, IT IS MIXED USE, BUT IT'S A VERY SMALL FOOTPRINT.

I GUESS FOR ME PERSONALLY, I'D LIKE TO SEE MORE RETAIL SPACE THERE.

AND I GUESS IF IN THE, IN THE PUP, I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN HOLD ANY KIND OF SQUARE FOOTAGE. I GUESS MAYBE I'LL ASK STAFF THAT QUESTION.

IT DOES SAY 2500 HERE.

THE PARKING SAYS 35. THERE'S A LITTLE DISCREPANCY THERE IN THOSE TWO.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANYTHING TO HOLD THEM TO THAT OR OR.

THAT'S JUST PRELIMINARY.

WELL, NO, AS NOTED BEFORE, IT'S UP TO THE BOARD'S PURVIEW TO CHANGE THE CONDITIONS BECAUSE THESE ARE DIFFERENT THAN PROFFERS IF YOU FEEL LIKE THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOULD BE RAISED OR DECREASED.

YEAH. I MEAN, FOR ME PERSONALLY, I'D LIKE TO SEE MORE RETAIL.

I'LL DEFER TO THE THE BROOKLYN SUPERVISOR, BUT I, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE RETAIL BECAUSE IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MIXED USE, WHERE ARE PEOPLE GOING? I MEAN, WE'RE, WE'RE GOING TO PUT 224 UNITS.

WE'RE GOING TO END UP PUTTING. WHAT ARE WE USING 2.2.

SO WE'RE GOING TO PUT 600 PEOPLE ALMOST IN THIS AREA.

AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE 125 BY TEN RETAIL SPACE.

THAT'S THAT'S NOT A LOT OF RETAIL PEOPLE HAVE TO EAT AND LIVE.

SO BUT I'LL DEFER TO THE BROOKLYN RESIDENT ON, ON THAT, THAT ON THAT CONDITION, I GUESS, BUT CORRECT.

AND SOME OF IT, I WILL SAY IS IT'S CLOSE PROXIMITY TO BROAD STREET AND OTHER AMENITIES IN THE AREA. SO WE DO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.

YEAH, WE HAVE A LOT OF OTHER HOUSING GOING IN IN THAT AREA TOO.

AND I DON'T, WHAT I HAVE NOT LOOKED AT IS WHAT THE RETAIL IS WITH ALL THE OTHER HOUSING THAT WE HAVE OUT THERE. I DON'T, I JUST DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THIS IS A SMALL NUMBER, 1.3 OR 4%. I THINK THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW.

MR. CHAIR, THANK YOU. YES, SIR. MR. ROGERS. MR. SMITH. AYE.

THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU, MR. ROGERS, FOR THOSE QUESTIONS AS WELL.

[01:05:02]

I'M GOING TO START. I HAVE A COUPLE TOPICS.

I GUESS WE'LL START WITH MR. LLOYD. WE'LL START WITH YOU. WHILE YOU'RE UP THERE, I DON'T WANT TO BRING YOU BACK UP AND FORTH A COUPLE TIMES. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT LET'S LET'S START WHERE MR. ROGERS ENDED, I CONCUR.

SO IN LOOKING AT THIS, IT'S ABOUT 180 ZERO ZERO ZERO SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL. AND THEN ABOUT 2500 IN SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR RETAIL.

YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY I CONCUR.

I'D LIKE TO SEE CERTAINLY MORE.

THIS ISN'T A REZONING. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT. I EVEN FOUND MYSELF CONFUSED BY IT A LITTLE BIT EARLIER TODAY.

THE APPLICANT IS NOT ASKING TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY.

THIS IS AN M1 PROPERTY WITH ALL THE USES AND PRIVILEGES THAT COME WITH M1.

THIS IS JUST A PROVISIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO USE THE YOU KNOW, THE OVERLAY, THE WESTWOOD OVERLAY FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH I THINK AT LEAST I'LL SPEAK FOR MYSELF PERSONALLY.

THE OVERLAY IS WONDERFUL. IT'S A WONDERFUL TOOL THAT OUR PLANNING STAFF AND DEVELOPERS HAVE CERTAINLY A WONDERFUL TOOL THAT THIS BOARD HAS PUT IN, BUT IT'S BEEN, YOU KNOW, IT'S MEANT TO PROVIDE FOR MIXED USE.

SO I WOULD CONCUR THAT THE ADDITIONAL RETAIL SPACE WOULD BE PREFERRED.

AND I CERTAINLY NOTED, MR. RIGGS, YOUR MATH IS CORRECT.

IT'S LIKE 1.4% OF THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE LOCATION.

SO NO QUESTION IN THERE.

MR.. LLOYD, JUST A JUST A POINT OF REFERENCE WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THE TOTALITY OF THE PLAN. LET'S TALK ABOUT THE PARKING STUDY FOR A SECOND, BECAUSE I DO WANT TO MR. ROGERS MENTIONED THAT THERE'S NO DEFINITION OF THE ONE, 2 OR 3, AND I KNOW THAT IT'S I KNOW THERE'S A TIMELINE. SO CAN YOU TALK ABOUT THE TIMELINE A LITTLE BIT? YOU MENTIONED IT THAT THIS COULD BE YEARS BECAUSE OF THE CURRENT OCCUPANT.

AND THE REASON FOR THE NODE DECISION ON THE BEDROOM IS YOU WANT TO BE FLEXIBLE TO THE MARKET. IF I UNDERSTAND THAT, IT COULD BE YEARS.

AND THEN YOU WANT TO FIGURE WHAT THE MARKET IS AT AT THAT POINT IN TIME.

IS THAT CORRECT? AND THEN HOW DOES THE TIMELINE WHAT IS THE TIMELINE FOR THIS? YES, SIR. SO THE EXISTING USE THAT'S CURRENTLY THERE WOULD BE AND I'M GOING TO LOOK TO MY CLIENT TO CONFIRM.

SO PERHAPS, MR. BLOOM, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND BEING ABLE TO, TO JOIN ME, I THINK YOU COULD HELP US WITH THE CURRENT TERM OF THE EXISTING LEASE AND WHAT THE EXPECTED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE THAT WOULD FOLLOW.

JAKE BLOOM WITH SPY ROCK.

GOOD EVENING. THE CURRENT TENANT IS A CREMATORIUM AND THEY HAVE AT LEAST THROUGH FEBRUARY OF 2029. AND OUR INTENT WOULD BE TO LINE UP THE DEVELOPMENT IF THIS P P P P WERE TO BE APPROVED, TO ALIGN OUR START WITH THE TERM, THE CULMINATION OF THEIR LEASE IN FEBRUARY OF 2029.

AND MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I COULD RESPOND TO THE FIRST COMMENT THAT MR. SCHMIDT ASKED, AND ALSO THAT MR. ROGERS RAISED REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF OF THE RETAIL.

AND WE CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THAT. AND I WON'T DISPUTE THE MATH THAT WAS SHARED WHEN WE APPROACHED THE WHEN WE CAME FORWARD WITH THIS APPLICATION, IT WAS BASED ON WHAT WE UNDERSTOOD THE COUNTY'S OBJECTIVES TO BE FOR THE WESTWOOD OVERLAY TRACT AND. AND THERE IS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT AS THIS.

I KNOW THIS BOARD IS AWARE THAT FOR A PUP TO BE AVAILABLE AS SOMETHING THAT WOULD AUTHORIZE THIS MULTIFAMILY USE, THAT THERE MUST BE A NONRESIDENTIAL COMPONENT OF THAT. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO MINIMUM THAT'S SET FORTH THAT WOULD CREATE CLEAR GUIDANCE AS TO AN APPLICANT AS TO WHAT THE BOARD'S EXPECTATIONS WOULD BE, AS TO THAT RELATIVE BALANCE BETWEEN ONE AND THE OTHER.

AS I THINK THIS BOARD IS, IS VERY WELL AWARE AND YOU'VE HEARD BEFORE, THE ROOFTOPS ARE THE THING THAT GENERATE THE RETAIL VIABILITY.

AND SO THIS PROJECT MIRRORS WHAT WAS DONE AT THE ALTAR, WHICH IS TO TRY TO CREATE THE RESIDENTIAL VITALITY THAT, ONCE ESTABLISHED, WILL HELP ALLOW THE OTHER RETAIL USES TO BE ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE.

WE SEE THAT THAT ORDER OF OPERATIONS IS BEING VERY IMPORTANT.

AND WE BELIEVE THIS PROJECT ALIGNS WITH THAT OBJECTIVE AND WITH THE OVERALL GOALS OF THE WESTWOOD OVERLAY. AND SO WE HOPE THAT THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT THE BOARD WOULD BE ABLE TO CONSIDER AS THEY WEIGH WHAT'S THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF ONE VERSUS THE OTHER.

GOTCHA. JUST SO I GOT THAT CORRECTLY.

LIKE YOUR POINT WAS THAT THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDS THE DEPTH OF RESIDENCE.

RESIDENTIAL BUILDS WOULD LEAD, THEN LEAD TO THE MARKET BRINGING THE MIXED USE. YES, SIR. THAT'S THE PLAN.

GOTCHA. ALL RIGHT. THE PARKING STUDY THAT WAS BY TIMMINS.

I THINK IT'S DATED JANUARY. SO THAT COULD BE.

I MEAN, I'M SURE IT'S IT'S CORRECT, BUT THAT THEY DIDN'T TAKE INTO THE ACCOUNT THE ONE BEDROOM, TWO BEDROOM, THREE BEDROOM. SO CAN YOU SPEAK TO THE FORMULA THEY USE TO GET.

THEY JUST TOOK 224 UNITS AND GOT THE 1.35 CARS PER UNIT.

I'M GUESSING THEY JUST USED TWO.

I MEAN, IS THAT THE MATH THEY USE? I THINK WE'D ALL AGREE THAT A STUDIO VERSUS A THREE BEDROOM COULD POSSIBLY HAVE A DIFFERENT CAR FORMULA AND I WOULD IMAGINE TIMMINS WOULD SAY THE SAME.

BUT IF YOU LOOK AT TIMMINS.

THE STUDY FROM JANUARY THE 23RD, 303 CARS OFF STREET, WHICH EQUATES TO 1.35 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT.

THEY JUST USED THE DWELLING UNIT ITSELF AS A SWAG.

[01:10:01]

I'M GUESSING TWO BEDROOM.

THEY DID. THAT'S CORRECT, YOUR MR. SCHMIDT. AND THAT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS PARKING GENERATION MANUAL, WHICH IS THE WHAT PROVIDES THE GUIDANCE RATHER THAN TIMMINS JUST PICKING THEIR OWN METRIC TO USE.

THEY USED ONE THAT ENGINEERS WITH THIS WITHIN THIS DISCIPLINE WOULD FIND IS THE APPROPRIATE NUMBER TO THEN YIELD THE GENERATION THAT THE REPORT RECOMMENDS, AND THEY HAD SOME SPARE.

IF I REMEMBER, THERE WAS LIKE 17 OR SOMETHING ON A WEEKDAY, AND THEN I DON'T KNOW HOW THE NUMBERS EXACTLY, BUT I THINK IT'S 17.

THEY WERE OVER IN THE WEEKDAY AND OVER BY 19 OR SOMETHING ON THE WEEKEND THAT WOULD OBVIOUSLY CHANGE IF THERE WAS MORE 2 OR 3 BEDROOMS THAN THERE WERE STUDIOS, I WOULD IMAGINE. ARGUABLY IT COULD.

YOU'RE CORRECT, MR. SMITH. ALL RIGHT.

ONE LAST QUESTION BEFORE WE TRANSFER TO STAFF.

THE 100 FOOT HEIGHT ALLOWANCE HERE FOR THE SEVEN STORIES.

DO YOU KNOW, OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD, PRESTON, I'M GOING TO ASK STAFF THE SAME QUESTION IN THIS AREA. WHAT? ANY COMPARABLE BUILDINGS THAT WOULD THIS BE? WHERE DOES THIS LEAD THE PACK ON HEIGHT IN THIS AREA.

IT'S OUR BELIEF THAT THE KINSALE PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY 75FT, GIVE OR TAKE, SO THAT MAY OFFER A COMPARABLE FOR THE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION.

YEAH. JUST YOU KNOW, I'M GOING TO ASK STAFF THERE.

WELL, MORE VERSED IN THIS THAN THAN ME, BUT I WOULD IMAGINE THAT THAT 100 PUSHES THE LIMIT IN THAT AREA. I DON'T THINK THERE'S MUCH TO COMPARE IT TO UNTIL YOU GET OVER BEHIND WILLOW LAWN. I'M GUESSING RIGHT TO THE TOWER.

CORRECT. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT.

WELL, THANK YOU SIR. MR..

MR. MOORE, I GOT A COUPLE OF THINGS JUST TO CLEAR UP ON THIS, JUST BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, JUST A FEW QUESTIONS STILL RUNNING THROUGH MY MIND ON THIS ONE. OKAY.

ON PAGE SEVEN OF THE STAFF REPORT, IT ALLUDES TO.

AND I WANT TO GET THE, THE ACROSS THERE ACROSS 14 ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS, 8512 ADDITIONAL UNITS HAVE HAD A REZONING, PROVISIONAL USE PERMIT OR PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED AND SUBMITTED.

SO JUST VERY SHORTLY AGO, JUST NOT EVEN LIKE A WEEK OR SO AGO, WE GOT UPDATED ON THAT.

WE, I GUESS WE ASKED STAFF FOR SOME DETAILS AND YOU GUYS WERE FANTASTIC PROVIDING THIS FULL MAP OF DEVELOPMENT.

SO I KNOW THAT THIS ISN'T MEMORIZED, BUT I GOT A COUPLE QUESTIONS ON IT.

SPECIFICALLY IN THE TUCKER DISTRICT, LET'S TALK ABOUT SCHOOLS FOR A SECOND IN THIS ZONE WEAR. SPY ROCK EXISTS.

DO YOU HAVE A MAP OF THIS? PERFECT. THANK YOU. IN THIS ZONE WHERE SPY ROCK EXISTS.

THIS. THIS RIGHT THERE IN THE MIDDLE. THIS POP2026 1022.

RIGHT HERE. THERE'S TWO BELOW IT.

THE TOTAL ABOUT 580 UNITS.

JOCK STREET AND WEST BROAD.

THOSE PODS AND I MEAN THOSE THOSE TWO PUPS HAVE BEEN APPROVED.

WE DO HAVE ONE. IT'S THE 4400 ON WEST BROAD.

WE DO HAVE THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND IT'S ABOUT 132 AND 164 UNITS PART OF THAT POD.

FOR JOCK STREET. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY PODS FILED YET, BUT THE PUPS BEEN APPROVED.

2023. YES. SO APPROXIMATELY THESE SEVEN JUST WITHIN WHAT I CALL WESTWOOD PROPER.

THERE'S SEVEN DEVELOPMENTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

THAT WOULD YIELD ABOUT 3000 UNITS.

THOSE WOULD ALL CONTRIBUTE TO THE JOHNSON, TUCKAHOE AND TUCKER.

AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHERE I'M GOING. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT FOR THAT ANSWER.

IF I LOOK AT ON ON THAT MAP THERE, IF I LOOK FROM WEST BROAD TO JOCK STREET, INCLUDING THIS PUMP APPLICATION, FAMILY HOLDINGS, WHICH IS, I WOULD SAY ALMOST ACROSS THE STREET.

YES. SO 1000 UNITS FAMILY IS 1000 UNITS.

AND GOING TO YOUR EARLIER QUESTION, IF YOU DON'T MIND, THAT IS ONE OF THE TALLER ONES. THE PUP ALLOW IS 175 ON THE FAMILY HOLDINGS ON THAT BIG PROPERTY.

YEAH. AS IT GETS INTO MAY WILL WHICH THAT PUP WAS APPROVED IN 2023.

CORRECT. AND THEN OF COURSE THE ANTHEM KINSALE PROPERTY.

AND THEN THE LAST ONE UP A LITTLE FURTHER UP STAPLES MILL ACROSS FROM LIBBIE MILL.

RIGHT. AND THE 2021 PUP.

SO IN THAT CORRIDOR, WHICH YOU GUYS WERE VERY KIND TO LAY OUT SCHOOL DISTRICTS.

THAT IS 3200 BY MY MATH, PLUS OR MINUS CORRECT UNITS MINUS THIS PUBLIC. SO TO BE FAIR, MINUS THE 224 HERE, 3000 UNITS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED AND WOULD ADD ON TO THAT SCHOOL DISTRICT WHEN BUILT.

CORRECT, THAT ARE NOT YET OUT OF THE GROUND. CORRECT. AND SO THE EVEN IF WE TAKE THE APPLICANT'S NUMBER FOR TUCKER OF 8 TO 10, YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH EACH ONE OF THESE AND

[01:15:04]

ADD THOSE IN. SO BY LOOKING AT PAGE THREE.

EVEN IF WE TOOK THE. 17 IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND I WOULD CONCUR THAT THAT EVIDENCE TO ALDER IS EVIDENCE THE SAME, THAT TEN MIGHT BE A BETTER NUMBER, PARTICULARLY IF IT'S SMALL BEDROOMS, ONE BEDROOM, TWO BEDROOM. BUT THEN YOU GOT TO EXTRAPOLATE THAT ACROSS ANOTHER 3000 UNITS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED THAT ARE NOT IN THIS NUMBER BECAUSE THOSE STUDENTS AREN'T IN SCHOOL YET.

RIGHT. AND SIMPLE MATH, IF 8 OR 10 IS THE NUMBER OF 224, YOU GOT TO FIGURE IT'S 80 TO 100 FOR 2200, 120, 115, AND 3000, WHICH WOULD PUT TUCKER SOMEWHERE AROUND 110% CAPACITY.

CORRECT. AND THAT'S NOT ACCOUNTING.

AND I DON'T HAVE THE FIGURES FOR THE REST OF THEM. I HAVE TO PULL THOSE INDIVIDUALLY. AND THESE ARE APPROVED AND DONE.

AND IN THE IN THE WORKS THAT COULD COME OUT OF THE GROUND AT ANY TIME WITHOUT ANY FURTHER ACTION BY THIS BOARD. JUST THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH. SOME WOULD HAVE TO GO OBVIOUSLY GO THROUGH DEVELOPMENT. CORRECT.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I MEAN, THAT'S A LARGE CONSIDERATION.

DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION, MR. ROGERS? JUST TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT, YOU TALKED ABOUT THE HIGH SCHOOL, BUT IT'S ACTUALLY I MEAN, ALL OF THESE UNITS IN THIS CORRIDOR ARE AT.

TUCKAHOE MIDDLE SCHOOL, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

IS THAT WHAT I'M LOOKING AT ON THIS MAP? AND TUCKAHOE IS WITHIN 120 RIGHT NOW.

RIGHT. SO SO YOU MENTIONED THE 3000 UNITS AFFECTING.

TUCKER HIGH SCHOOL, BUT IT'S ACTUALLY 8200 UNITS AFFECTING TUCKAHOE MIDDLE SCHOOL.

BECAUSE THE ACROSS BROAD STREET GOES TUCKAHOE ALSO BECAUSE BECAUSE TUCKAHOE MIDDLE GOES A COUPLE. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, CRESTVIEW JOHNSON, ETC.

BUT SO GOOD GOOD SEGUE BECAUSE THE NEXT QUESTION WAS GOING TO BE THOSE 3200 UNITS WE TALKED ABOUT ARE ONLY ON THE BROOKLYN SIDE.

THOSE ONES ARE JUST MINE.

CORRECT. WHICH SCALES BACK TO 2021 ARE YET TO COME OUT OF THE GROUND.

CORRECT. IN THIS AREA THAT WE ARE RIGHTFULLY TRYING TO DEVELOP WITH AN OVERLAY FOR A MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL RIGHT ON BROAD STREET.

THIS IS THE PURPOSE FOR THIS AREA. I GET IT ACROSS BROAD STREET.

YOU'VE GOT 734 LIBERTY MILL.

ALMOST DONE. COMING ON BACK DOWN 2500 AT WILLOW LAWN AND 1500 TO 2000 MR. ROGUISH. THAT'S NOT MINE.

THAT'S THE REYNOLDS CROSSING.

SO YEAH, THAT MAKES MORE THAN 8000 UNITS READY TO GO.

THAT DEVELOPERS HAVE PERMISSION TO PROCEED ON.

THAT AREN'T BEING ACTED ON RIGHT NOW.

CORRECT. LET'S GO. RIGHT.

LIKE READY TO GO. JUST NOTHING HAPPENED YET, RIGHT? OKAY. AND YOU KNOW, I'M THANKFUL THAT THIS APPLICANT HAS A LITTLE TIME, BUT THAT'S A LITTLE SCARY FOR ME.

AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S A LITTLE MORE MATH AND CONTEMPLATION THAT NEEDS TO BE FIGURED BECAUSE QUITE FRANKLY, I WILL SPEAK JUST FOR MYSELF HERE.

I WANT THIS WESTWOOD AREA.

WE OVERLAID THIS WESTWOOD AREA TO DO THIS, TO POP RESIDENTIAL AND TO, TO POP RETAIL AND MAKE IT A THRIVING PLACE TO LIVE, WALK, PLAY, EAT, POP INTO A STARBUCKS, I GET IT.

BUT WHEN, YOU KNOW, LIKE ALL THESE APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GOING OUT HERE NOW FOR FIVE YEARS AND I'M JUST, I GUESS I NEED TO DIVE INTO WHY IT HASN'T YET OCCURRED.

MR. MANAGER, I BELIEVE ONE OF THE FIRST CONVERSATIONS THAT WE HAD WAY BACK WHEN WAS I THINK YOU TOLD ME, WE'RE GOING TO GET IN THERE RIGHT NOW AND WIDEN THE STREETS AND PAVE THEM. AND YOU DID.

AND THAT WAS WAS PRIMED, READY TO GO.

YES. AND I REMEMBER I'VE BEEN PART OF THESE CONVERSATIONS WITH ALL THESE FOLKS HERE.

AND YEAH, THE UTILITIES ARE READY TO ROLL.

AND I JUST CAN'T FIGURE OUT FOR THE LIFE OF ME WHY FIVE YEARS NOW, THIS THIS HAS BEEN REALLY, REALLY GOOD TOOL BECAUSE I THINK SOMETIMES I, I WON'T SAY WE, I LOOK AT A CASE, YOU LOOK AT THE UNITS, YOU DO THE MATH ON SCHOOLS SORT OF FITS MAKES SENSE.

BUT YOU'RE, YOU KNOW, YOU DON'T GET A CHANCE TO LOOK BACK AND SAY, WELL, THERE'S, THERE'S 3200 UNITS THAT WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN PERMISSION.

GREEN FLAG. LIKE LET'S GO WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MAYBE LIKE YOU SAID, A POD HERE AND THERE STILL TO COME.

AND AT WHAT POINT DO YOU THROW THE CAUTION FLAG AND SLOW THE TRAFFIC DOWN A LITTLE BIT TO SEE WHAT IMPACT THE 8000 UNITS WITHIN A FEW MILES ARE GOING TO HAVE ON THE COMMUNITY.

I'VE GOT RESIDENTIAL PAPA WILLOW LAWN DRIVE RIGHT NOW.

THEY KNOCKED DOWN THOSE OLD OFFICE BUILDINGS ACROSS FROM THE MALL. AND I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT PROGRESS, BUT THAT'S THE THAT'S HONESTLY PRESTON, THAT'S THE CONCERN THAT I HAVE THAT RIGHT NOW.

[01:20:04]

MISS MOORE, DO YOU KNOW, OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD YOU MENTIONED 175 AT FAMILY HOLDINGS, 100FT ANYWHERE ELSE IN WESTWOOD RIGHT NOW, SEVEN STORIES ANYWHERE ELSE IN WESTWOOD RIGHT NOW.

WELL NO, NOT CURRENTLY PROPOSED.

WE DO HAVE MAY WELL, AS AN EXAMPLE, THEY PROPOSED A SEVEN STORY ANTHEM.

WE HAVE I BELIEVE A COUPLE EIGHT STORY BUILDINGS.

SO IT IS IN KEEPING WITH WHAT WE'VE BEEN SEEING.

YEAH. AND THE ANTHEM ONE, I WAS SPECIFICALLY INVOLVED IN THAT CONVERSATION BECAUSE IT'S RIGHT ALONG BROAD STREET. RIGHT? CORRECT. BROAD STREET CORRIDOR. ALL RIGHT. MISS MOORE, I THINK I'M OUT OF I DO HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION.

THIS IS PROBABLY MORE SEMANTICS THAN IT IS, BUT I NOTICED AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS NUMBER 15 THAT PROHIBITED USES ONCE THIS IS ONCE THIS PUP IS APPROVED, IT'S PROHIBITED. THIS PROPERTY IS PROHIBITED TO BE USED AS A CREMATORY.

SO IS IT RIGHT THERE IN 15 B? YES. SO THE CONDITIONS RUN WITH THE LAND.

OKAY. SO SO HOW DOES THE TIMING WORK ON THAT.

SO AS SOON AS WE APPROVE THIS PUB LET'S SAY IT'S APPROVED TOMORROW THIS PUP IS APPROVED.

I GUESS THAT JUST GOES IN HOLDING.

THEY CAN KEEP USING THE LAND TOMORROW EVEN THOUGH WE'VE SAID THAT NOW THAT'S A NON CONFORMING USE. YES, IT WOULD JUST CONTINUE AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T DISCONTINUE FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS. BUT ONCE THAT USE DISCONTINUES AND THE DEVELOPMENT STARTS THEN IT'S NO LONGER A FEASIBLE USE.

CORRECT. OKAY. MR. CHAIRMAN, WOULD YOU ENTERTAIN A RESPONSE.

YEAH. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. PLEASE GO AHEAD. THANK YOU, MR. SCHMIDT. I'LL SAY I CONCUR WITH MISS MOORE'S ANALYSIS OF THE NONCONFORMITY THAT SHE JUST SHARED.

BUT GOING BACK TO THE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR QUESTION, AND YOU MENTIONED MY NAME, SO I'LL TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND AND APPRECIATE THAT OPPORTUNITY. WE WOULD BE DELIGHTED TO WORK WITH MR. SCHMIDT TO WORK THROUGH SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT HE AND MR. ROGERS HAVE VOICED ABOUT THE PROPRIETY OF, OF THE AMOUNT OF APPROVALS THAT THIS BOARD HAS EXTENDED TO TRY TO BRING FORWARD THE VISION FOR WESTWOOD.

AND SO WE'VE HEARD A NUMBER OF OF THOSE CONCERNS FOR THE FIRST TIME THIS EVENING.

AND WE'D BE DELIGHTED TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK THROUGH THAT IF IT WOULD BE THE BOARD'S PLEASURE TO PASS THIS ONE BY FOR THE EVENING.

YEAH, I APPRECIATE IT. IT'S NOT THAT THE CASE AS A WHOLE IS BAD.

I MEAN, WE MET ON THIS A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.

I WANT TO SAY. YES, SIR.

IT'S IT'S THE REVELATIONS OF BAD WORD.

IT'S THE CONCERN THAT.

THAT THIS THE THAT I BELIEVE THAT THE COUNTY HAS REALLY PUT FORTH A WONDERFUL PLAN FOR THIS AREA. AND WE'RE SEEING IT IN APPROVALS.

WE'RE CERTAINLY SEEING IT IN DESIRE BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY.

I THINK THIS SIGNIFIES PRETTY STRONG DESIRE BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY TO BE IN THERE.

I, I JUST DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH WATER YOU KEEP PUTTING IN THE BUCKET BEFORE YOU SEE WHAT THE IMPACT IS COMING OUT? THAT'S THE CONCERN.

THAT'S THE BIGGEST CONCERN I HAVE AT THIS MOMENT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MY COLLEAGUES? I DON'T WANT TO CUT YOU OFF, BUT GO AHEAD MA'AM. YEAH, I WOULD SIMPLY I KNOW WE HAVE SCHOOL A SCHOOL REP HERE.

IS THERE ANYTHING WE'RE MISSING AS FAR AS INFORMATION THAT'S BEING PROVIDED? I KNOW THERE'S KIND OF A STATEMENT IN THE PACKET THAT SAYS THAT YOU KNOW, IT WOULD BE ENCOURAGED.

I THINK THAT THAT OTHER METHODS ACCOMMODATING NEW STUDENTS START TO BE EXAMINED IS THE LANGUAGE THAT'S IN THIS PACKET HERE. SO ARE THOSE METHODS BEING EXAMINED? YES.

GOOD AFTERNOON, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD AND MR. MANAGER. SO CURRENTLY, AS YOU ALL ARE ALL AWARE, WE WENT THROUGH A BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT PROCESS THIS PAST FALL, WHICH DOES IMPACT TUCKER HIGH SCHOOL. WE ARE ANTICIPATING TUCKER HIGH SCHOOL TO DECREASE IN FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS.

AS A PART OF THAT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT PROCESS AS STUDENTS MATRICULATE OUT AND MOVE TO THEIR NEWLY ZONED SCHOOL OF HERMITAGE HIGH SCHOOL.

THAT IS WAS DONE IN ANTICIPATION FOR A LOT OF THESE UNITS.

WE ARE WELL AWARE THAT WE HAVE 8000 UNITS COMING UP IN AND AROUND TUCKAHOE AND TUCKER HIGH SCHOOL FOR TUCKAHOE MIDDLE.

THEY ARE GETTING A MODULAR UNIT NEXT YEAR.

SO WE ARE LOOKING AT THE TEMPORARY SOLUTION FIRST FOR TUCKAHOE, AS WE TYPICALLY DO FOR ALL OF OUR SCHOOLS.

AND THEN WE WILL BE MOVING TOWARDS LOOKING AT PROGRAMMATIC ADJUSTMENTS, MAYBE LOOKING AT REDUCING I'VE SEATS IF NECESSARY.

BUT THAT IS THE LAST DITCH EFFORT.

WE DON'T LIKE REDUCING SEATS IF AT ALL POSSIBLE.

AND THEN THE MORE PERMANENT SOLUTION WOULD BE ANOTHER BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT PROCESS FOR THAT SCHOOL. SO WE ARE LOOKING AT THINGS.

WE ARE LOOKING AT A LONG RANGE PLAN.

IT'S JUST WAITING AND WATCHING AT THIS CURRENT MOMENT AS THESE ARE FIVE,

[01:25:03]

TEN, 15 YEAR BUILD OUTS.

THANK YOU MA'AM. ANYTHING ELSE FROM MY COLLEAGUES.

MR. LLOYD, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING UP THE FACT OF JUST HAVING FURTHER CONVERSATION ABOUT IT, AND I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT YOU HAVE A TIMELINE FOR IT. I ALSO WANT TO MAKE NOTE, I FULLY AGREE WITH YOU THAT RESIDENTIAL DRIVES DRIVES MIXED USE.

I'VE HEARD MR. NELSON SAY IT ENOUGH.

YEARS AND YEARS I'VE BEEN SITTING HERE, HE'S TRYING TO DRIVE, YOU KNOW, THE RESIDENTS CALLING FOR RESTAURANTS AND THINGS IN THEIR AREA.

I HEAR IT WHEN I WAS REPRESENTING LAKESIDE BEFORE IT SWITCHED OVER TO FAIRFIELD, I HEARD SUPERMARKETS, I HEARD RESTAURANTS, AND YOU CAN ONLY GO IN TO HOBNOB A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIMES ON THAT STREET BEFORE YOU'RE LOOKING FOR THE NEXT PLACE. AND I AGREE WITH YOU.

I GUESS THAT IS AT THE ACTUAL CUSP OF WHAT MY CONCERN IS, IS THAT WE'VE CERTAINLY DONE THE WORK WITH RESIDENTIAL, AND I KNOW THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY PAYS ATTENTION TO IT. I KNOW THEY CAN DO THIS MATH AS WELL, AND I'M WAITING TO SEE WHERE THE MIXED USE FOLLOW IS.

AND I JUST HAVE I'M HAVING A HARD TIME SEEING IT RIGHT NOW.

SO ON THAT NOTE, IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE PIPELINE PROJECTS AND DO MORE WORK ON THIS, AND I THINK I THINK THIS IS SHAREABLE.

YEAH. OH, YEAH. YEAH. GO AHEAD, MR. CHAIR. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

SO WE WANT TO EXTEND AN INVITATION TO A PERSON PRESENT IN THIS ROOM.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE PROCEED TO THE PODIUM IN THE BACK.

ARE THERE ANY PERSONS PRESENT ONLINE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

SEEING THAT THERE ARE NO PERSONS PRESENT IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED, MR. SMITH. YEAH, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. AND I DON'T THINK COUNCIL OR MYSELF ARE SURPRISED BY THAT.

YOU KNOW, THIS HAS NOT HAD A LOT OF COMMUNITY INPUT.

IT'S TUCKED AWAY IN THIS REALLY IN THIS AREA THAT IS HAS HAD THIS CONVERSATION BEFORE, BUT REALLY NEED TO DO SOME DIVING IN WITH STAFF ON THIS PIPELINE, 88,000 UNITS WITHIN THIS MILE, A COUPLE MILE RADIUS DESERVES A LITTLE BIT OF A LITTLE BIT OF CHECK BEFORE WE, WE CONTINUE TO APPROVE RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT DON'T SEEM TO BE COMING OUT OF THE GROUND. I GOT A PUPPY FROM 2021 FOR THE SAME SIZE.

232 NOT MOVING PUPPY FROM 22, NOT MOVING PUPPY FOR 23 1200 I HAVE SOME CONCERN ABOUT CONTINUING TO APPROVE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES AND JUST BUILDING UP THIS UNGODLY BACKLOG OF THEN WHAT BECOMES BUILDABLE BY RIGHT WITH NO, NO CHECKPOINT BY THIS ELECTED BODY TO BALANCE SCHOOLS.

AND I ALSO MADE A NOTE TO BALANCE PUBLIC SAFETY AN AMBULANCE SERVICE AND FIRE SERVICE AND POLICE SERVICE, AND OUR TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, WHICH I SERVE ON THE BOARD OF GRTC.

AND OBVIOUSLY THIS IS A DESIRABLE AREA BECAUSE THE PUBLIC BUS LINE GOES RIGHT THROUGH THERE. SO THE THE IMPACT OF 8000 ROOFTOPS OR UNITS ON THAT, ON ROADWAYS, ON THE 100 FOOT HEIGHT, AND CERTAINLY ON THE SQUARE FOOT DETAIL.

MR. LLOYD, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT BACK UP ON THE ON THE CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS.

SO I JUST THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME MORE DISCUSSION HERE AND SOME MORE UNDERSTANDING ABOUT WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE WESTWOOD START TO SEE SOME IMPROVEMENT.

SO, MR. CHAIR, IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS BY MY COMMENT ABOUT MY COLLEAGUES, I'LL MOVE THAT PUP2026100022 SPY ROCK REAL ESTATE GROUP BE DEFERRED TO THE TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8TH MEETING 2026 AT THE REQUEST OF THE BOARD, NOT THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU, MR. SMITH. THE MOTION WAS MADE BY MR. SMITH. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND BY REVEREND NELSON.

ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY.

NAY. THE AYES HAVE IT.

THE MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU.

NEXT, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, YOU MOVE TO THE THREE CHOP DISTRICT WITH AGENDA ITEM 97-26. BEFORE YOU IS A DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, WITH A CONDITIONAL REZONING FROM A-1 TO R6C GENERAL RESIDENCE DISTRICT.

THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS 9.9 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST LINE OF POUNCEY TRACT ROAD NEAR ITS INTERSECTION WITH CANE ROAD.

TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL IS PUT FORWARD.

MISS MOORE, I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A DEFERRAL THAT HAS BEEN REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT ON THIS. YES, SIR. UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING TO JUNE 9TH, MR. CHAIR. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS MISS ROUNDTREE.

[8b. 97-26 REZ-2025-103169 Three Chopt Bacova Development Company LLC: Request to conditionally rezone from A-1 Agricultural District to R-6C General Residence District (Conditional) Parcels 738-768-8557, 739-768-0748, 739-768-0890, 739-768-1321, and 739-767-1691 containing 9.941 acres located on the west line of Pouncey Tract Road approximately 320’ north of its intersection with Kain Road. The applicant proposes townhomes. The use will be controlled by zoning ordinance regulations and proffered conditions. The 2026 Comprehensive Plan recommends Suburban Mixed Use. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors grant the request. ]

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS ANYBODY PRESENT? LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? YES, SIR. PLEASE GO TO THE MIC.

THANK YOU SIR.

[01:30:12]

THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THE CHANCE TO ADDRESS.

I'VE LIVED OFF TRACK IN A SMALL, QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THE LAST 40 YEARS.

THE BUILDING THAT HAS GONE ON.

AND WE NOW HAVE MULTIPLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND A SENIOR LIVING CENTER WITH ENTRANCES ON PONCY TRACK WITH VERY BAD TRAFFIC ISSUES.

THE ENTRANCES AND EXITS TO THOSE PLACES ARE TURNED, SO THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE LEFT.

TURNS OUT OF THEIR LEFT, TURNS INTO THE NEIGHBORHOODS.

THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME.

PONCY TRACK HAS BECOME A NIGHTMARE AND YOU'RE ALREADY TALKING ABOUT NOW.

ONE MORE DEVELOPMENT WITH NO PLANS TO IMPROVE PONZI TRACK OR MAKE IT SAFER FOR THE PEOPLE THAT ALREADY LIVE OUT THERE, THE CHILDREN THAT GO TO SCHOOL, THE SOCCER FIELDS THAT ARE THERE.

THERE'S A LOT THAT GOES ON, AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS NOT GET APPROVED UNTIL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS GET DONE IN THAT AREA.

SO THANK YOU. NO, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING OUT AND COMMENTING.

MADAM. GOOD EVENING. DISTINGUISHED MEMBERS OF THE ENRICO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. FELLOW VILLAGE RESIDENTS IN IN ATTENDANCE.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I AM MARCIA BARTON.

I RESIDE AT 4720, THE VILLAGE PLACE IN GLEN ELLEN.

I AM A CURRENT BOARD MEMBER OF THE VILLAGE UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, AND I OCCUPY THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY.

BUT TONIGHT I RISE AS A 77 YEAR OLD RESIDENT AND REPRESENTATIVE OF THE VILLAGE COMMUNITY TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED BUT STILL UNDER CONSIDERATION, CUT THROUGH OF THE STUB ROAD FROM THE PROPOSED TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT ONTO VILLAGE PROPERTY, SPECIFICALLY ONTO THE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED ROAD, THE VILLAGE PLACE WHERE MY HOME IS LOCATED.

THE VILLAGE WAS BUILT AS A 55 PLUS COMMUNITY BETWEEN 2023 AND 2025.

THE MEAN AGE OF OUR RESIDENTS IS ESTIMATED BETWEEN 75 AND 85 YEARS OLD.

WE WISH TO REMIND THIS AUGUST BODY THAT AGE RELATED VISION, HEARING AND MOBILITY ISSUES ARE COMMON, EVEN PREVALENT IN OUR COMMUNITY.

SOME HAVE HAD. SOME OF US HAVE HAD JOINT REPLACEMENT SURGERY OR SUFFER OTHER AGE RELATED AILMENTS THAT MAKE MOVEMENT DIFFICULT.

WE RELY ON SCOOTERS AND WALKERS AND CANES TO NAVIGATE THE NARROW SIDEWALKS, AND OFTEN CHOOSE TO TRAVEL BY FOOT IN THE ROADWAYS INSTEAD.

MANY OF US RELY ON VISUAL ACUITY OR HEARING DEVICES TO MAINTAIN OUR PERSONAL SAFETY.

THE ADDITION OF 74 NEW FAMILY HOMES WITH AN ESTIMATED TWO CARS PER FAMILY, TRAVELING TWICE A DAY TO WORK OR SCHOOL, OR TAKING A SHORT CUT TO THE MAILBOX CLUSTER BEFORE OR AFTER WORK, PERMITS THE POSSIBILITY OF APPROXIMATELY 300 ADDITIONAL VEHICLES TRAVERSING THREE SHARP TURNS WITHIN 150FT OF PRIVATE ROADWAY TO CONNECT WITH POUNCEY TRACT ROAD, WHERE, INCIDENTALLY, NO LEFT TURN IS PERMITTED.

POSTED SPEED LIMITS WILL NOT ALLEVIATE THE EXTENT OF OUR CONCERN, CONSIDERING THE PROBABILITY OF KIDS ON BIKES AS THEY MAKE THEIR WAY TO SCHOOL ON POUNCEY TRACT PARK OR TO POUNCEY TRACT PARK.

IT'S THE PROPOSED DENSITY AND FREQUENCY OF THE TWO WAY TRAFFIC ON OUR 24 FOOT ROAD.

PRIVATE ROADS THAT SPELLS PERIL.

WE, THE SENIORS OF THE VILLAGE PURCHASE PROPERTIES HERE.

AFTER BOTH THE DEVELOPER AND BUILDER PROMISED AN OASIS OF SAFETY AMID THE ABUNDANCE OF CONVENIENCE OFFERED IN SHORT PUMP.

WE WERE ASSURED, AND MY NOTES QUOTED COMMISSIONER SHIPPEY FROM APRIL 9TH CONFIRM THAT THE TOWNHOME PROJECT COULD BE APPROVED BY THE SUPERVISORS WITHOUT THIS CUT THROUGH.

NOTED IN THE DESIGN PLAN, AND THAT NO CUT THROUGH WOULD BE WOULD OCCUR UNLESS IN QUOTING HERE, UNLESS BOTH PARTIES AGREED TO THIS SECONDARY INGRESS EGRESS. MY NEIGHBORS AND I WERE IMMEDIATELY RELIEVED.

HOWEVER, GIVEN MY DUAL ROLE AS BOARD MEMBER AND RESIDENT, I LEARNED OF SUBSEQUENT CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE DEVELOPER'S ATTORNEY SUGGESTING THAT ASSURANCE HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN.

AND AND BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND THAT SECONDARY ACCESS COULD STILL BE NEGOTIATED. IN A PRIVATE MEETING WITH MR. SHIPPY AND MR. LIVINGSTON ON MAY 8TH, OUR FULL VILLAGE BOARD, SEEKING FURTHER CLARIFICATION, RECEIVED YET ANOTHER ORAL ASSURANCE OF THIS

[01:35:02]

SAME UNLESS AGREED UPON BY BOTH PARTIES, LANGUAGE.

IT IS EVIDENT THAT VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ARE STRONGLY OPPOSED TO ANY BREACH OF OUR PROPERTY, AND THAT OUR ASSOCIATION BOARD WILL NEVER AGREE TO THIS PROPOSED CONNECTION.

WE ARE EVEN NOW INVESTIGATING WAYS TO AMEND OUR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION BYLAWS TO PROHIBIT THIS TYPE OF INCURSION IN PERPETUITY.

WE STRONGLY URGE YOU, THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS, TO CONSIDER APPROVING THE TOWNHOME PROJECT WITH THE CAVEAT TO NEVER ALLOW THIS NORTHERNMOST SECONDARY ACCESS TO OUR VILLAGE COMMUNITY TO CONSIDER INSTEAD THE HEALTH, THE SAFETY AND QUIET ENJOYMENT OF THE ELDERLY RESIDENTS WHO PURCHASED HOMES IN THE VILLAGE ONLY 2 TO 3 YEARS AGO.

SENIORS WHO BELIEVE THAT THIS, POSSIBLY THEIR VERY LAST HOME, WOULD PROVIDE A SAFE AND QUIET ENVIRONMENT IN THEIR FINAL YEARS.

THE VILLAGE RESIDENTS ANXIOUSLY AWAIT YOUR DETERMINATION WHENEVER THAT COMES.

AND ON BEHALF OF THESE SENIORS, I THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, MADAM. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? HI, MY NAME IS JENNIFER LIEBERMAN, AND I'M QUITE PERPLEXED THAT I'M GIVING THIS SPEECH, GIVEN THAT I SPOKE ABOUT THE DANGERS OF CUTTING DOWN TREES IN YOUR APPROACH TO REPLACEMENT IS PRETTY COMPARABLE TO PUTTING SALT INTO AN OPEN WOUND.

BUT IT SEEMS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION CARES MORE ABOUT SHORT TERM GROWTH OVER ECONOMIC STABILITY FOR THE CURRENT POPULACE OF THE GENERAL AREA.

BUT I SUPPOSE MY SPEECH IS TITLED THE CALCIFICATION OF TIMBER OVER PULSATING THE ENFRANCHISEMENT OF THE POWERFUL.

I WILL SAY THAT I WILL FIRST START BY SAYING THAT I WENT TO THE SURVEY SITE YESTERDAY TO HAVE A MORE INFORMED VIEW ON THIS TOPIC, AND I FIND IT QUITE INSULTING THAT THE SIGN OF SORTS THAT WAS THERE TO INFORM THE PUBLIC WAS SOMEWHAT HIDDEN BY TREES.

BUT I LOOKED AROUND FOR QUITE A BIT.

I SAW LOTS AND LOTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TREES, ALL IN VARIOUS HEIGHTS AND SIZES.

IF WE GO WITH A VERY LIBERAL AMOUNT WITH FIVE FEET BETWEEN ROWS AND FIVE FEET BETWEEN EACH TREE, IT SEEMS THAT EACH CALCULATOR THAT I USE SAYS THERE ARE OVER 17,000 TREES.

AS I SAID, I STOOD BY THE ROAD AND JUST LOOKED AROUND, NOT TRESPASSING. SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE THAT MANY TREES, BUT GIVEN THAT THIS IS UNTOUCHED PROPERTY, I'M GOING JUST GOING TO PRESUME THERE ARE THAT MANY. FURTHERMORE, I'M GOING TO DO REPLACEMENT MATH.

IF WE ARE GOING TO THINK ABOUT THIS IN A MORE OBJECTIVE WAY, WE ARE GOING TO USE THREE NATIVE SPECIES DOGWOOD, RED MAPLE, AND SWEET GUM TREES.

BECAUSE ALL OF YOU CELEBRATED PLANTING 10,000 TREES 5 OR 6 WEEKS AGO.

I'M JUST GOING TO SPLIT THAT NUMBER FOR THE THREE TYPES OF TREES.

AND I'M GOING. I'M JUST GOING TO SAY ALL OF THESE ARE TEN YEARS OLD, AND WE ARE GOING AND WE DIVIDE THE AMOUNT BETWEEN THE THREE TREES, EVEN THOUGH I'M CERTAIN THAT ALL OF THEM ARE OLDER THAN THAT.

I'M ALSO GOING TO GO WITH THE VERY CONSERVATIVE NUMBER AND SAY ALL OF THEM ARE 24IN IN CIRCUMFERENCE.

I'M ALSO GOING TO BE USING THE IDEA THAT THE REPLACEMENT TREES ARE FIVE YEARS OLD.

FOR REPLACEMENT. YOU WOULD NEED, CONSERVATIVELY, 10,000 DOGWOODS BETWEEN 10 AND 15,000 MAPLE AND OVER 15,000 SWEETGUM.

LASTLY, WE CAN ALSO IMAGINE THE IDEA THAT THIS AREA IS OCCUPIED BY BIRDS LIKE CHICKADEES, FINCHES, SPARROWS THAT EAT THE SEEDS AND THE GUMBALLS FROM THE SWEETGUM TREE, OR PERHAPS WHITE TAILED DEER, BLUEJAYS AND CARDINALS THAT EAT THE BERRY LIKE FRUIT FRUIT FROM THE DOGWOOD, OR EVEN RACCOONS, RABBITS AND OWLS THAT EITHER EAT THE LEAVES OR SAP OR USE THEM FOR HUNTING PURPOSES.

I CAN ALSO TALK ABOUT THE ECOSYSTEM BENEFITS FOR THE AREA LIKE I DID TWO WEEKS AGO, BUT I HOPE THAT YOU GET MY POINT.

ANYHOW, WHAT I'M REALLY ASKING FOR TODAY, AND BECAUSE I THINK THAT THIS MAY NOT DISSUADE YOU ON THE MATTER, I ASK THAT YOU ALL EITHER SAY YES TO PROPERTY VALUES THAT WILL GO DOWN DUE TO THE LACK OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HELP DETER HEAT AND WATER DAMAGE.

ARE YOU SAYING NO TO THESE BLOOD THIRSTY ANTI-ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIALISTS? THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS CASE? IS ANYBODY PRESENT ONLINE? I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE. THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

THEREFORE, SINCE THERE IS NO ONE PRESENT OR ONLINE, I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE.

THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED, MISS ROUNDTREE.

SO I DID LEARN EARLIER THIS EVENING THAT THE DEFERRAL REQUEST WOULD BE FORTHCOMING.

WE DID HAVE A MEETING MYSELF, MR. SHIPPEY, MY PLANNING COMMISSIONER, MET WITH REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE DEVELOPER

[01:40:01]

YESTERDAY TO, TO FLESH OUT SOME LAST CONCERNS.

AND I THINK THAT THAT IS WHAT IS GIVING RISE TO THE DEFERRAL SO THAT WE HAVE SOME TIME TO, TO, TO TALK MORE ABOUT THAT, SIR, REGARDING YOUR CONCERNS ABOUT POUNCEY TRACT, I WILL TELL YOU THAT THERE ACTUALLY ARE IMPROVEMENTS TO POUNCEY TRACT THAT ARE PART OF THIS PROPOSAL.

THAT IS ONE OF THE POSITIVES ABOUT THE PROPOSAL.

SO CERTAINLY WE CAN GIVE YOU MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THAT.

MA'AM I KNOW THAT THAT STUB ROAD HAS HAS LONG BEEN A POINT OF CONTENTION.

IT WAS BROUGHT UP AT THE COMMUNITY MEETING I ATTENDED AS WELL. AND I KNOW MR. SHIPPY HAS HAD MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS.

SO THAT I THINK IS SOMETHING THAT CERTAINLY CAN BE ADDRESSED.

I HEAR YOU WHEN YOU SAY WE NEED THE LANGUAGE IN THERE THAT SO THAT THERE IS NO AMBIGUITY.

AND THE LAWYER IN ME LOVES THAT SUGGESTION.

SO I THINK THAT THOSE TWO PARTICULAR ISSUES ARE, ARE VALID ISSUES THAT, THAT WE CAN THAT ARE WORKABLE.

THOSE ACTUALLY AREN'T THE, THE, THE GIST OF MY CONCERNS THAT I BROUGHT UP WITH THE DEVELOPER YESTERDAY.

SO, BUT I WON'T GO INTO THAT BECAUSE I AM WAITING FOR A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION ON THOSE CONCERNS AND WE'LL SEE WHERE WE GO FROM THAT. BUT BEING THAT THAT IS THE CASE, I DO BELIEVE THAT A DEFERRAL IS APPROPRIATE.

SO, MR. CHAIR, I MOVE THAT REZ 2025-103169.

A DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC BE DEFERRED TO THE JUNE 9TH, 2026 MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

MOVE BY MISS ROCHER. IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY REVEREND NELSON? ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT.

I'M. DEFERRAL HAS BEEN APPROVED.

MR. CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, YOU MOVE INTO PUBLIC HEARINGS.

OTHER ITEMS. THE FIRST ITEM ON YOUR AGENDA IS 98-26.

AND THIS IS A RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY.

THIS IS FOR LEASE OF COUNTY PROPERTY FOR CAFE 1611, WHICH IS IN THE BROOKLYN DISTRICT. MR. MASSEY. THANK YOU, MR. MANAGER. MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, THIS BOARD PAPER AUTHORIZES THE COUNTY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH TROLLEY HOUSE REFRESHMENTS, INC.

FOR THE KITCHEN AND DINING AREA KNOWN AS CAFE 1611.

ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, TROLLEY HOUSE WILL SELL FOOD AND BEVERAGES AND CAFE 1611 FOR EMPLOYEES, JURORS AND OTHER VISITORS TO THE ADMINISTRATION.

BUILDING THIS LEASE WOULD BE FOR A THREE YEAR TERM,

[9. Public Hearings – Other Items ]

WITH OPTIONS TO EXTEND THE TERM FOR THREE ADDITIONAL ONE YEAR PERIODS.

[9a. 98-26 Resolution - Signatory Authority - Lease of County Property - Café 1611 - Brookland District. ]

TROLLEY HOUSE WILL PAY AN ANNUAL RENT OF $1 DURING THE TERM OF THIS AND REIMBURSE THE COUNTY FOR ELECTRICAL COSTS.

THE DEPUTY COUNTY MANAGER FOR ADMINISTRATION AND THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE BOARD PAPER AND THE COUNTY MANAGER CONCURS.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR. COLLEAGUES, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION? PUBLIC HEARINGS.

YEAH. I'M SORRY. IS ANYBODY PRESENT? I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS. THIS ITEM.

ANYONE ONLINE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

THERE'S NOBODY IN PERSON ONLINE. SO MOVED.

SECOND. MOVED BY NELSON.

SECOND BY MR. ROGERS. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT. THE RESOLUTION IS APPROVED.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, 99-26 IS AN ORDINANCE THAT WOULD MOVE TEMPORARILY THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE MONUMENT HILLS PRECINCT, WHICH IS IN THE BROOKLYN DISTRICT FROM TUCKAHOE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TO CRESTVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. MR. NEWBY, WOULD YOU COVER THIS FROM THE DAIS? YES, SIR. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. MR. MANAGER, THIS BOARD PAPER WOULD, AS THE MANAGER STATED, MOVE ONLY TEMPORARILY.

THE POLLING PLACE FOR THE MONUMENT HILLS PRECINCT IN THE BROOKLYN DISTRICT FROM TUCKAHOE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TO CRESTVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ONLY FOR THE AUGUST 4TH, 2026, PRIMARY ELECTION.

THE CHURCH HAS OTHER ACTIVITIES, I BELIEVE A BIBLE SCHOOL SCHEDULED FOR ITS FACILITIES ON THAT DATE OF THE PRIMARY ELECTION AND IS UNABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE

[9b. 99-26 Ordinance - To Amend and Reordain Section 9-2 Titled “Precincts and polling places” of the Code of the County of Henrico to Move Temporarily the Polling Place for the Monument Hills Precinct in the Brookland District from Tuckahoe Presbyterian Church to Crestview Elementary School for the August 4, 2026, Primary Election. ]

ELECTION ON THAT DAY, BUT WOULD RESUME BEING THE POLLING PLACE AFTER THE PRIMARY ELECTION AND IN TIME FOR THE NOVEMBER ELECTION.

ELECTORAL BOARD REQUESTS APPROVAL. THE BOARD PAPER AT ITS MEETING ON APRIL 20TH AND FOR INFORMATION. MONUMENT HILLS HAS ABOUT A THOUSAND VOTERS.

CRESTVIEW HAS ABOUT 2800.

SO COMBINING THEM, EVEN TEMPORARILY, WILL NOT EXCEED THE GENERAL RULE OF THUMB OF 5000 VOTERS PER POLLING PLACE.

I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. COLLEAGUES, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. NEWBY? IF NOT, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THAT IN PERSON PRESENT? I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

ANYBODY ONLINE? I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

THAT BEING SAID, THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

IS THERE A MOTION? SO MOVED.

SECOND. MOVED BY MISS RAUSCH, SECONDED BY MR. SMITH. SO MOVED BY MR. SMITH, BY MISS ROWNTREE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. THE RESOLUTION IS APPROVED.

THE ORDINANCE. EXCUSE ME.

NEXT, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD 100 DASH 26 IS A RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY DRAINAGE AND FLOOD MITIGATION.

THIS IS FOR 2304 MARTIN STREET IN THE FAIRFIELD DISTRICT.

YES. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU, MR. MANAGER. MR. CHAIR, HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THIS BOARD PAPER WILL AUTHORIZE THE ACQUISITION OF 2304 MARTIN STREET FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOOD MITIGATION.

[01:45:04]

THE OWNER HAS AGREED TO SELL THE PROPERTY FOR 323,000.

THE DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC WORKS AND REAL PROPERTY RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE BOARD PAPER. THE COUNTY MANAGER CONCURS.

COLLEAGUES. ANY QUESTIONS? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE PRESENT LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? IF NOT, IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM. ALL RIGHT.

THAT BEING SAID, THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED, SO TO SPEAK, TO ME SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ACQUISITION OF THIS PROPERTY. WELL THIS IS PART OF THE HENRICO VOLUNTARY ACQUISITION PROGRAM.

THIS IT'S A, IT'S A PROGRAM THAT HELPS RESIDENTS REDUCE THE RISK AND STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY RESILIENCE. AND HENRICO LAUNCHED A VOLUNTARY ACQUISITION PROGRAM TO PURCHASE FLOOD PRONE PROPERTIES.

HOMEOWNERS CAN CHOOSE TO TAKE PART IN THE PROGRAM, CONTRIBUTING TO THE LONG TERM SAFETY AND A STRONGER, MORE RESILIENT COMMUNITY. AWESOME.

THAT'S WHAT WE WANT. YES, SIR.

SO MOVED. SECOND. MOVED BY MYSELF.

SECONDED BY VINCENT. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT. RESOLUTION APPROVED.

THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU SIR. OH.

I'M SORRY. NO, NO. GO AHEAD.

NO, I GO AHEAD AND JUMP INTO THE NEXT ITEM.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY.

THIS IS A QUITCLAIM OF PORTIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS 8501 AND 8551 OLD VIRGINIA LANE, BOTH IN THE FAIRFIELD DISTRICT.

THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN, MR. MANAGER. MR. CHAIR, HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. THIS NEXT ITEM IS BEING PRESENTED.

THIS PAPER AUTHORIZES THE CHAIR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED, RELEASING ANY INTEREST THE COUNTY MAY HAVE IN PORTIONS OF UTILITY EASEMENTS ON THE VCC HOTEL AND VCC HOTEL. TWO PROPERTIES AT 8501 AND 8551 OLD VIRGINIA LANE.

THE OWNERS HAVE REQUESTED THIS ACTION. THE COUNTY DOES NOT NEED THE AFFECTED EASEMENT AREAS AND THERE ARE NO COUNTY FACILITIES IN THOSE AREAS.

[9c. 100-26 Resolution - Signatory Authority - Acquisition of Real Property - Drainage and Flood Mitigation - 2304 Martin Street - Fairfield District. ]

THE REAL PROPERTY DIVISION HAS PROCESSED THIS REQUEST THROUGH THE COUNTY MANAGER FOR COMMUNITY OPERATIONS AND THE DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING AND PUBLIC UTILITIES.

[9d. 101-26 Resolution - Signatory Authority - Quitclaim of Portions of Existing Utility Easements - 8501 and 8551 Old Virginia Lane - Fairfield District. ]

WITHOUT OBJECTION. THE DIRECTOR OF REAL PROPERTY RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE BOARD.

PAPAL APPROVAL OF THE BOARD PAPER.

THE COUNTY MANAGER CONCURS.

I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU SIR. COLLEAGUES. ANY QUESTIONS? SEEING NONE, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS ANYONE PRESENT PHYSICALLY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? IF NOT, IS THERE ANYBODY ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM.

HEARING THAT THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

SO MOVED. SECOND. MOVED BY MYSELF.

SECONDED BY REVEREND NELSON. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE.

OPPOSED? AYES HAVE IT.

THE RESOLUTION IS APPROVED.

THANKS. MR. CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. IS YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD? WE DO HAVE ONE INDIVIDUAL THAT HAS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, JENNIFER LIEBERMAN. AND THEN IF THERE.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN ATTENDANCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK THIS EVENING? OKAY. WE HAVE A GENTLEMAN BACK HERE.

ALL RIGHT, MISS LIEBERMAN. I BELIEVE YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE RULES.

SO MY THIS SPEECH TODAY IS TITLED THE SLOW ABSORPTION OF GREED, SATIATED BY AN EVER GROWING LIST FOR AN UNTOUCHABLE STATE OF EXCELLENCE.

WHEN WE LOOK AT SPORTS, THERE ARE PARTICULAR SPOTS IN HENRICO COUNTY THAT DO WELL, SAY, AMERICAN FOOTBALL WITH HIGHLAND SPRINGS ARENA OR GIRLS TENNIS WITH

[10. Public Comments ]

FREEMAN. SO I WOULD NEVER TRY TO ASSERT THAT I SEE THEM AS NON INTEGRAL TO THE SECONDARY SCHOOL EXPERIENCE, AS I THINK THAT THEY SERVE AN IMPORTANT COMMUNITY FOR SO MANY.

BUT I HAD TO PONDER QUITE A LOT ON WHY HENRICO COUNTY WOULD CHOOSE DOUGLAS FREEMAN HIGH SCHOOL AS A STARTING POINT FOR INSTALLING SYNTHETIC.

I MEAN, INSTALLING TURFGRASS MADE OUT OF A COMBINATION OF SOME SORT OF SYNTHETIC TOP LAYER, WHICH, BASED ON MY RESEARCH, IS MADE BY ASTROTURF, PERHAPS USING THEIR POWER BASE.

WHY ESSER, WHICH UTILIZES POLYPROPYLENE AND ORGANIC INFILL, WHICH AT LEAST BASED ON WHAT I'VE READ, IS NOT LIKE GREEN PLAY, WHICH IS CORK AND COCONUT.

I WILL SAY THAT TURF GRASS WITH ORGANIC INFILL SOUNDS GREAT IN THEORY.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE RAIN RUINING IT OR EVEN SPRAYING DEADLY POISON ON IT, BUT THERE ARE SO MANY ISSUES WITH SUCH MATERIALS BEING USED, SAY WITH QUARK AND CREATING DUST PARTICLES DUE TO A BREAKING DOWN OR CAUSING WATERWAY ISSUES WHEN IT RAINS AND IT GETS WHISKED AWAY DURING HEAVY DOWNPOURS.

BUT THE BIGGEST ISSUE AT HAND IS THAT BIG.

IS IT BEING MADE OUT OF POLY ETHYLENE? POLYPROPYLENE HAS ITS USES, SAY, IN TEXTILES OR FOOD PACKAGING, BUT THE ISSUE LIES IN IT BEING USED IN A FIELD.

THE SPORTS THAT ARE BEING PLAYED ON THESE FIELDS ARE GROUND CONTACT SPORTS, MEANING THAT THE CHILDREN WILL BE GETTING, SAY, GRASS RASH, WHICH MAY CAUSE CARDIAC OR CANCER RELATED ISSUES DOWN THE LINE DURING PHYSICALLY DANGEROUS GAMES.

ANYWAY, I HAVE TO WONDER, GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT ARE AT PLAY

[01:50:05]

HERE, IS THIS NOT PAY FOR PLAY POLITICS? IS THIS NOT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST? AS I FIND IT ODD THAT A SCHOOL THAT HAS NO CHAMPIONSHIP HISTORY OF ANYTHING ON A FOOTBALL FIELD WOULD GET SOMETHING SO EXPENSIVE EXPENSIVE, WHICH FROM MY ESTIMATES THAT I'VE READ, IS BETWEEN 5 AND $10,000 PER YEAR JUST FOR REPAIRS. IS IT DUE TO A BOARD MEMBER OR SCHOOL BOARD? SCHOOL. SCHOOL. IS IT DUE TO SOMEONE IN THE COUNTY HAVING SOME SORT OF CONNECTION TO CHILDREN WHO GO TO FREEMAN? I'M NOT SURE. REGARDLESS, AT THE END OF THE DAY, I DON'T INTERACT WITH VERY MANY TO HAVE AN INFORMED COMMUNITY VIEW, TO HAVE AN OPINION. BUT PERHAPS THE PARENTS IN THE DISTRICT ARE IN FAVOR OF THEIR CHILDREN HAVING MEDICAL ISSUES LIKE ASTHMA OR DEVELOPING LYMPHOMA FROM THIS CHEMICAL RIDDEN MESS OF A PROJECT. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE? YES, SIR. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY.

MY NAME IS PAUL MALMQVIST.

I LIVE AT 5406 EDGEFIELD STREET IN THE FAIRFIELD DISTRICT OF HENRICO COUNTY, AND I AM CALLING ABOUT SOME CONCERNS SOME NEIGHBORS IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE HAD, AND SOME NEIGHBORS IN MY BROTHER'S NEIGHBORHOOD OF SPRINGDALE ARE HAVING ABOUT ALL THIS CONSTRUCTION OF GLENWOOD FARMS AND THE NEW HOUSING ALONG HARVEY ROAD, AND HOW WHILE THESE NEW HOMES ARE GOING UP, THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THOSE RESIDENTS THERE IN TERMS OF GROCERY STORES, BANKS OR DOCTORS OFFICES.

IF YOU GO FROM CREIGHTON ROAD ALL THE WAY TO CHAMBERLAIN AVENUE, WE HAVE ONE FOOD LION, NOTHING ELSE.

HENRICO PLAZA HAS NOW BEEN DEVELOPED INTO HOUSING.

LABURNUM AVENUE. PLAZA HAS LOST MOST OF THEIR BUSINESSES EXCEPT FOR DOCTOR'S OFFICE AND A VAPE STOP SHOP. AND PEOPLE ARE SAYING THE ONLY WAY THEY GOT TO GO IS GO THROUGH THE CONGESTED MESS THAT HAS BECOME LABURNUM AVENUE AND MECHANICSVILLE TURNPIKE.

AND I BELIEVE IN MY CASE, IT'S AN AVENUE IN MIDDLEBRIDGE ROAD.

NOW I KNOW RICHMOND TURNPIKE.

EXCUSE ME. I KNOW YOU ARE WIDENING IT YET, BUT THE WIDENING OF WILKERSON ROAD AND THE IMPROVEMENTS THEY DID. THEY'RE NOT WIDENING. BUT WHAT Y'ALL DID THERE HAS MADE THAT STRETCH OF AZALEA BETWEEN WILKERSON AND RICHMOND TURNPIKE GOING TO MECHANICSVILLE A REAL NIGHTMARE, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE SCHOOL BUSSES COME OUT OF HENRICO HIGH OR DOUGLAS WILDER MIDDLE SCHOOL. AND AT SOME POINT THE PEOPLE ARE JUST GOING TO SAY, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. THEY NEED SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE THERE AND IT NEEDS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY DON'T NEED TO GO THROUGH THOSE INTERSECTIONS TO DO THEIR SHOPPING OR RESTAURANTS. AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SOLUTION IS, BUT IT IS BECOMING MORE AND MORE UNPLEASANT TO LIVE THERE.

AND MANY OF THE OLDER CITIZENS IN MY DISTRICT OR MY NEIGHBORHOOD OF VILLAGE OF AZALEA, WHICH WAS STARTED IN 1980, JUST LOOK AND SHAKE THEIR HEADS.

GO, WHAT IS WRONG WITH HENRICO COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION? AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT ELSE TO SAY.

I MEAN, TRYING TO BE REAL NICE ABOUT IT, BUT MAN, IT IS A MESS. SOMETIMES THEY TRAVEL AROUND THAT NEIGHBORHOOD LIKE UNLIKE IT WAS EVEN AZALEA MALL WAS THERE.

WE DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM THERE.

THERE'S BEEN GONE, WHICH SINCE 1995 OR SO.

AND WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT TROUBLE THERE.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT Y'ALL WANT TO DO.

OR TO MAYBE SLOW DOWN THE BUILDING OF ALL THESE NEW HOMES, BECAUSE IF THE ECONOMY EVER GOES SOUTH, YOU'RE GOING TO FIND YOURSELF IN A SITUATION LIKE I FORESAW OR OVERHEARD EARLIER TONIGHT, WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF NEW HOMES AND NOBODY ABLE TO AFFORD THEM, AND I PROBABLY WON'T BE AROUND TO LIVE TO SEE IT THAT LONG. BUT THAT DAY IS FAST COMING, BECAUSE I THINK A LOT OF THE PROJECTIONS OF HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO WANT TO COME TO THAT AREA OF HENRICO COUNTY IS WAY OVER, OVER WHAT THE TRUE REALITY IS.

SO I THANK YOU. Y'ALL HAVE A GOOD EVENING.

AND I THINK I GOT, WHAT, A MINUTE 33.

I JUST WANT TO SAY I WANT TO THANK THE HENRICO COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD FOR WHAT THEY DID EARLIER. AND I'M HEADING ON.

Y'ALL HAVE A GOOD EVENING.

BYE. THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? I'M STILL A PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC COMMENT

[01:55:01]

SECTION. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK PUBLIC COMMENT? THERE'S NO ONE TO SPEAK ON WEBEX.

ALL RIGHT, MR. MANAGER. MR. CHAIR, SEEING NO ONE, YOU MOVE INTO YOUR GENERAL AGENDA.

THE FIRST ITEM IS 100 AND 2-26, A RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY FOR CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR A&E SERVICES FOR TUCKAHOE PARK, WHICH IS IN TUCKAHOE DISTRICT.

MR. ZUNINO. THANK YOU, MR. MANAGER. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

ON FEBRUARY 8TH, 2022, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AWARDED A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,538,170 TO VAN HAGEN BRUCE LAND, INC. FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR TUCKAHOE PARK.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION, ADMINISTRATION AND CLOSEOUT, INCLUDING A REVISED SITE PLAN REQUIRED.

[11. General Agenda ]

[11a. 102-26 Resolution - Signatory Authority - Contract Amendment for Architectural and Engineering Services for Tuckahoe Park - Tuckahoe District. ]

CHANGES TO LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, EROSION CONTROL, STORM SEWER ROUTING, WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS, GRADING, ADJUSTMENTS OF PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND LIGHTING, AND RESTUDYING THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.

A LUMP SUM FEE OF $234,895 HAS BEEN NEGOTIATED FOR THE ADDITIONAL WORK, AND THE BOARD'S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THIS AMENDMENT WOULD INCREASE THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT BY MORE THAN 15% TO A TOTAL OF $1,773,065.

THIS BOARD PAPER AUTHORIZES THE COUNTY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT IN THE FORM APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES BY VAN HAGEN.

BRUCE LIND, INC., THE DIRECTOR OF RECREATION AND PARKS AND PURCHASING DIRECTOR, RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF BOARD PAPER, AND THE COUNTY MANAGER CONCURS.

I'LL ADD THAT THAT PERCENTAGE WOULD GO TO 15.3% OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT.

THANK YOU. AND WITH THAT, I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. COLLEAGUES, ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION? NO. JUST WHEN THE ACTUAL NEXT PHASE WOULD COME FOR THIS PROJECT, NEXT WEEK, WE WILL RECEIVE THE BID DOCUMENTS AND WE'LL WORK WITH PURCHASING TO PUT IT OUT TO BID, AND THEN IT WILL BE OUT TO BID FOR ABOUT 30 DAYS.

SO END OF JUNE OR JULY WOULD BE WHEN I WOULD BRING BACK THE PAPER FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

SEEING NONE, MR. ROGERS.

SO MOVE THE RESOLUTION.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? SECONDED BY MOVE BY MR. ROGERS. SECOND BY REVEREND OLSEN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? THE RESOLUTION IS APPROVED.

THANKS. MR. CHAIRMAN. MEMBERS OF BOARD 100 AND 3-26 IS A RESOLUTION FOR SIGNATORY AUTHORITY. THIS IS AN AWARD OF CONTRACT WILLIAMSBURG ROAD 24 INCH WATER MAIN, WHICH IS IN THE MARINA DISTRICT.

MR. CHAN. THANK YOU, MR. MANAGER. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, THIS IS A.

THIS. THIS IS AN AWARD OF FIXED PRICE CONTRACT FOR $4,710,600 TO MORGAN CONTRACTING FOR THE WILLIAMSBURG ROAD 24 INCH WATER MAIN PROJECT CONSISTING OF INSTALLATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4780 LINEAR FEET OF 24 INCH DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN,

[11b. 103-26 Resolution - Signatory Authority - Award of Contract - Williamsburg Road 24-Inch Water Main - Varina District. ]

140 INCH LINEAR FEET OF 12 INCH DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN, 200 LINEAR FEET OF EIGHT INCH DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN, AND 11 NEW HYDRANTS. WORK ON THE PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO BEGIN IN JULY AND BE COMPLETED WITHIN 375 CALENDAR DAYS.

WITH THAT, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. CHAIRMAN. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JOE? MOVE. THE RESOLUTION MOVED BY REVEREND NELSON, SECONDED BY MISS ROWNTREE.

ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE.

OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT.

THE RESOLUTION IS APPROVED. THANK YOU. NEXT, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, 100 AND 4-26.

THIS IS AN INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT WAS DISCUSSED IN WORK SESSION ON BULKY WASTE AND VACUUM LEAF COLLECTION.

MR.. THANK YOU, MR. MANAGER.

GOOD EVENING AGAIN, MR. CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

THIS BOARD PAPER WOULD INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE FEES FOR VACUUM LEAF COLLECTION SERVICES FROM $30 PER PER PICKUP FOR THE FIRST PICKUP, $50 TO EXCUSE ME, $30 PER PICKUP FOR THE FIRST PICKUP TO $50 PER PICKUP FOR THAT FIRST PICKUP, AND $50 PER PICKUP FOR THAT SECOND PICKUP,

[11c. 104-26 Introduction of Ordinance - To Amend and Reordain Section 17-59 Titled “Bulky waste and vacuum leaf collection” of the Code of the County of Henrico to Set the Fees for Vacuum Leaf Collection. ]

WITH $100 PER ADDITIONAL PICKUP AFTER THAT.

SO THAT WOULD BE THE THIRD IN EACH SUBSEQUENT ONE IN THE SAME CALENDAR YEAR.

CURRENTLY, AS I SAID, THOSE ARE $30.

THIS BOARD PAPER INTRODUCES THAT THAT ORDINANCE, AND IT WOULD BE UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE THE 9TH.

AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU, MISS JOB. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. JOB? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION? SO MOVED. MOVED BY MISS ROUNTREE, SECOND BY REVEREND NELSON.

SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT. THE RESOLUTION IS APPROVED. MR. CHAIR, I HAVE NO OTHER ITEMS THIS EVENING.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. MANAGER.

COLLEAGUES, ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS FROM OUR COLLEAGUES? SEEING NONE.

THANK YOU ALL. HAVE A GOOD NIGHT. MEETING IS ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

May 12, 2026 Board of Supervisors

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item